首页> 外文期刊>Applied Geography >Conceptions of 'home' and the political geography of refugee repatriation: between assumption and contested reality in Bosnia-Herzegovina
【24h】

Conceptions of 'home' and the political geography of refugee repatriation: between assumption and contested reality in Bosnia-Herzegovina

机译:“家”的概念与难民遣返的政治地理:波斯尼亚 - 黑塞哥维那的假设与争夺现实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent years have seen growing recognition of the dynamic and negotiated nature of cultural identity, and the globalization of political and economic processes. However, assumptions about the rootedness of people in particular places retain a powerful hold over public policy. This paper considers some of the consequences of this paradox by examining policies to promote the repatriation of refugees from European Union states to their 'homes' in Bosnia-Herzegovina since 1995. The question of when, andon what basis, different actors consider it safe or appropriate for refugees' exile to end is rooted both in different conceptions of 'home', and in varying assessments of individual, national and state interests. These lead in turn to different evaluations of 'success' of refugee return, and of policies to promote it.
机译:近年来,越来越多地认识到文化身份的动态和谈判性质,以及政治和经济流程的全球化。 然而,关于特定地方人民的根源的假设仍然持有对公共政策的强大持有。 本文考虑了这一悖论的一些后果,通过审查促进欧洲联盟国家的难民遣返难民,自1995年以来培养欧洲联盟的难民。何时,安登的问题,不同的演员认为它安全或 适合难民的流亡末端源于不同的“家”的不同概念,并在对个人,国家和国家利益的不同评估中。 这些铅反过来依据难民回报的“成功”的评价,以及促进它的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号