首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neuropathologica >Assessment of beta-amyloid deposits in human brain: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium.
【24h】

Assessment of beta-amyloid deposits in human brain: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium.

机译:人脑中β淀粉样蛋白沉积物的评估:BrainNet欧洲联盟的一项研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

beta-Amyloid (Abeta) related pathology shows a range of lesions which differ both qualitatively and quantitatively. Pathologists, to date, mainly focused on the assessment of both of these aspects but attempts to correlate the findings with clinical phenotypes are not convincing. It has been recently proposed in the same way as iota and alpha synuclein related lesions, also Abeta related pathology may follow a temporal evolution, i.e. distinct phases, characterized by a step-wise involvement of different brain-regions. Twenty-six independent observers reached an 81% absolute agreement while assessing the phase of Abeta, i.e. phase 1 = deposition of Abeta exclusively in neocortex, phase 2 = additionally in allocortex, phase 3 = additionally in diencephalon, phase 4 = additionally in brainstem, and phase 5 = additionally in cerebellum. These high agreement rates were reached when at least six brain regions were evaluated. Likewise, a high agreement (93%) was reached while assessing the absence/presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and the type of CAA (74%) while examining the six brain regions. Of note, most of observers failed to detect capillary CAA when it was only mild and focal and thus instead of type 1, type 2 CAA was diagnosed. In conclusion, a reliable assessment of Abeta phase and presence/absence of CAA was achieved by a total of 26 observers who examined a standardized set of blocks taken from only six anatomical regions, applying commercially available reagents and by assessing them as instructed. Thus, one may consider rating of Abeta-phases as a diagnostic tool while analyzing subjects with suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). Because most of these blocks are currently routinely sampled by the majority of laboratories, assessment of the Abeta phase in AD is feasible even in large scale retrospective studies.
机译:与β-淀粉样蛋白(Abeta)相关的病理表明,一系列病变在质量和数量上都不同。迄今为止,病理学家主要集中在对这两个方面的评估,但是将结果与临床表型相关联的尝试并不令人信服。最近已经以与iota和α突触核蛋白相关的损伤相同的方式提出,Abeta相关的病理学也可能遵循时间演变,即不同的阶段,其特征在于不同脑区域的逐步介入。 26位独立观察者在评估Abeta阶段时达成了81%的绝对共识,即阶段1 =仅在新皮层中沉积Abeta,阶段2 =另外在分配皮层中,阶段3 =另外在双脑中,阶段4 =另外在脑干中,阶段5 =另外在小脑。当评估至少六个大脑区域时,达到了很高的一致率。同样,在检查六个大脑区域时,评估是否存在脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)和CAA类型(74%)时,达成了很高的共识(93%)。值得注意的是,大多数观察者未能发现毛细血管CAA,因为它仅是轻度和局灶性,因此被诊断为1型,2型CAA。总之,共有26位观察者检查了Abeta阶段和CAA存在/不存在的可靠评估,他们检查了仅来自六个解剖区域的一组标准化区块,应用了市售试剂并按照指示进行了评估。因此,在分析疑似阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)的受试者时,可以考虑将Abeta阶段的等级作为一种诊断工具。由于大多数实验室目前都对这些区域进行了常规采样,因此即使在大规模的回顾性研究中,评估AD中Abeta阶段也是可行的。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号