首页> 外文期刊>Animal Feed Science and Technology >Effects of modifications to retain protozoa in continuous-culture fermenters on ruminal fermentation, microbial populations, and microbial biomass assessed by two different methods
【24h】

Effects of modifications to retain protozoa in continuous-culture fermenters on ruminal fermentation, microbial populations, and microbial biomass assessed by two different methods

机译:通过两种不同方法评估的瘤胃发酵,微生物种群和微生物生物量的连续培养发酵罐中预留原生动物的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An important limitation of continuous-culture fermenters is their inability of maintaining microbial populations similar to those observed in the rumen, especially protozoa numbers, which usually decrease markedly or even disappear. Two approaches (a polyurethane-sponge (SP) and a filter system (FIL) for additionally retaining protozoa were tested in continuous culture system already designed to retain protozoa (Muetzel et al., 2009), and their effects on microbial populations, fermentation parameters and microbial biomass were assessed. Two 14-day incubation runs were carried out with 6 fermenters, and in each run two fermenters were randomly assigned to each of the experimental treatments (control, SP and FIL). Total protozoa numbers assessed by microscopic counting were 1.7 and 2.1 times greater in SP and FIL fermenters than in control ones on day 14, although differences did not reach the significance level (P = 0.855). Protozoal DNA concentration on day 14 were 1.6 and 1.4 times greater in SP and FIL fermenters, respectively, than in control ones, but differences were not significant (P = 0.524). Results from protozoal DNA concentrations determined in each fermenter on the different sampling days (n = 48) were positively correlated (P & 0.001) with the numbers of total (r = 0.826), entodiniomorphid (r = 0.824) and holotrich (r = 0.675) protozoa determined by microscopic counting, indicating that both methods are valid to assess protozoa populations. The proportion of holotrich in FIL-fermenters was relatively constant over the incubation period (ranging from 10.5 to 13.3% of total protozoa), but decreased with time in control (from 10.9% at day 2 to 6.7% at day 14) and SP (from 10.9 to 6.9%) fermenters. Neither the bacterial DNA concentration nor the relative abundance of fungal and archaeal DNA were influenced by any of the modifications tested, but values changed over the sampling period (days 10-14). Bacterial DNA concentration increased (P & 0.001) from day 10 to 14 in all fermenters, whereas the relative abundance of fungal and archaeal DNA decreased (P & 0.001). The tested modifications did not affect (P & 0.05) fermentation parameters, which reached a steady-state after 6 days of incubation. Values of microbial biomass determined using purine bases as a microbial marker were significantly correlated with the amount of bacterial plus protozoal DNA (r = 0.794; P = 0.002; n = 12) in each fermenter. In conclusion, the two tested modifications increased the protozoa numbers in continuous-culture fermenters, and the FIL allowed maintaining a proportion of holotrich protozoa similar to that in the ruminal fluid used as inoculum.
机译:连续培养发酵罐的一个重要限制是它们无法将类似于瘤胃中观察到的微生物群体,特别是原生动物数量相似,这通常会显着降低或甚至消失。在已经设计为保留原生动物(Muetzel等,2009)的连续培养系统中,测试了两种方法(聚氨酯 - 海绵(SP)和过滤系统(FIL),并在连续的培养系统中测试(Muetzel等,2009),以及它们对微生物群体的影响,发酵参数评估微生物生物量。用6个发酵罐进行两次14天的孵育运行,并且在每次运行中,将两次发酵瓶随机分配给每个试验治疗(对照,SP和FIL)。通过微观计数评估的总异液量SP和FIL发酵罐中比在第14天的对照组中1.7和2.1倍,尽管差异没有达到显着性水平(P = 0.855)。SP和FIL发酵罐中的第14天的原生生物DNA浓度为1.6和1.4倍,分别在对照组中,但差异不显着(p = 0.524)。在每个发酵罐上测定的原生动物DNA浓度在不同的取样天(n = 48) e正相关(p& 0.001)总量(R = 0.826),埃塞托索尼罗(R = 0.824)和通过微观计数确定的原生动物,表明两种方法都有效以评估原生动量群体。在孵育期内Holotrich的比例相对恒定(范围为10.5-总原生动物的10.5%),但随着对照时间(在第14天的第2天至6.7%的10.9%)下降(从10.9到6.9%)发酵罐。细菌DNA浓度和真菌和古物DNA的相对丰度都不受到测试任何测试的任何修饰的影响,但在采样时期(第10-14天)变化的值。在所有发酵罐中的第10天至14日,细菌DNA浓度增加(P& 0.001),而真菌和古末端DNA的相对丰度降低(P& 0.001)。测试的修饰不影响(P& 0.05)发酵参数,在孵育6天后达到稳态。使用嘌呤碱基测定作为微生物标记物的微生物生物量的值与每种发酵罐中的细菌加原生动物DNA(r = 0.794; p = 0.002; n = 12)显着相关。总之,两个测试的修饰在连续培养发酵罐中增加了原生动物数量,并且允许维持与用作接种物的瘤胃流体中类似的Holotrich原生动物的比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号