首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the American Association of Geographers >Praxis in the City: Care and (Re)Injury in Belfast and Orumiyeh
【24h】

Praxis in the City: Care and (Re)Injury in Belfast and Orumiyeh

机译:普拉西斯在城市:在贝尔法斯特和奥卢穆耶的护理和(重新)受伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article builds on the geographic literature of nonviolence with the feminist literature of care ethics and positive security to explore the potential for a praxis that promotes relational urban social justice. We examine two cities-Belfast, Northern Ireland, and Orumiyeh, Iran-that have historically endured political struggles that continue to undermine the quality of urban life. We analyze vulnerability to political, environmental, and infrastructural violence in these two urban landscapes with an eye toward "just praxis" and "positive security," as we outline the ways in which Belfast and Orumiyeh are reinjured by institutional practices that purportedly seek urban social justice. First, we argue for the importance of care praxis in the light of the entanglement of a murder investigation with the Boston College oral history program "The Belfast Project," which recorded testimony from former and current members of paramilitary groups. Second, we examine an environmental justice movement in Orumiyeh, where activists navigate a contested political terrain shaped by state violence toward ethnic minorities and punitive economic sanctions from the international community. From this perspective, a just praxis acknowledges the ubiquity of violent conflict while it distinguishes global readings that occur from a distance to the intimate and interminable experiences of violence that take place in urban places. We argue that a more critical engagement with the relationship between care and vulnerability reveals the enormous potential of imagining geographies of existing and evolving relationalities of care rather than global assumptions from afar about vulnerable communities.
机译:本文建立了非暴力的地理文学与女权主义文学的关怀伦理和积极的安全性,探讨推动关系城市社会正义的普拉西的潜力。我们审视了两个城市 - 贝尔法斯特,北爱尔兰和奥穆伊厄,伊朗 - 历史上持久的政治斗争,继续破坏城市生活的质量。我们在这两个城市景观中分析脆弱性,以这两个城市景观中的政治,环境和基础设施暴力,以“只是普拉西斯”和“积极的安全性”,因为我们概述了贝尔法斯特和奥卢穆伊的方式被众所律的制度做法重新加注,据称寻求城市社会的机构做法正义。首先,我们争论护理普拉西斯的重要性鉴于与波士顿学院口头历史计划“贝尔法斯特项目”的谋杀调查的纠纷,记录了来自前者和当前的准军事团体成员的证词。其次,我们审查了奥卢梅伊赫的环境司法运动,活动人士在国际社会中向族裔少数群体和惩罚性经济制裁中展开有争议的政治地形。从这个角度来看,刚刚的普拉西斯承认暴力冲突的无处不在,因为它区分了全球读数,这些读数与城市地点发生的暴力居住的私密和可迁移的经验发生。我们认为,与护理和脆弱性之间关系的更为严重的参与揭示了想象现有和不断发展的关心关系的地域的巨大潜力,而不是来自远方的全球假设关于脆弱的社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号