首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the American Association of Geographers >Urban Movements and the Genealogy of Urban Rights Discourses: The Case of Urban Protesters against Redevelopment and Displacement in Seoul, South Korea
【24h】

Urban Movements and the Genealogy of Urban Rights Discourses: The Case of Urban Protesters against Redevelopment and Displacement in Seoul, South Korea

机译:城市权力和城市权利的家谱:韩国首尔的重建和排放的城市抗议者的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite significant contributions made to progressive urban politics, contemporary debates on cities and social justice are in need of adequately capturing the local historical and sociopolitical processes of how people have come to perceive the concept of rights in their struggles against the hegemonic establishments. These limitations act as constraints on overcoming hegemony imposed by the ruling class on subordinate classes and restrict a contextual understanding of such concepts as the right to the city in non-Western contexts, undermining the potential to produce locally tuned alternative strategies to build progressive and just cities. In this regard, this article discusses the evolving nature of urban rights discourses that were produced by urban protesters fighting redevelopment and displacement, paying particular attention to the experiences in Seoul that epitomized speculative urban accumulation under the (neoliberalizing) developmental state. Method-wise, the article makes use of archival records (protesters' pamphlets and newsletters), photographs, and field research archives. The data are supplemented by the author's in-depth interviews with former and current housing activists. The article argues that the urban poor have the capacity to challenge the state repression and hegemony of the ruling class ideology; that the urban movements such as the evictees' struggles against redevelopment are to be placed in the broader contexts of social movements; that concepts such as the right to the city are to be understood against the rich history of place-specific evolution of urban rights discourses; and that cross-class alliance is key to sustaining urban movements.
机译:尽管对进步城市政治提出的重大贡献,但对城市和社会司法的当代辩论需要充分捕捉到人们如何在对霸权机构陷入困境中察觉中的权利概念的地方历史和社会政治进程。这些限制充当逾期审判阶级犯下的霸权的限制,并限制了对非西方背景下的城市权利的语境理解,破坏了生产当地调整的替代战略,以建立进步和刚性城市。在这方面,本文讨论了城市抗议者制作的城市权利讨论的不断变化的性质,这些抗议者争夺重建和流离失所,特别关注首尔的经验,该经验在(新生化)发展状态下的突出投机城市积累。方法,文章使用档案记录(抗议者的小册子和新闻稿),照片和现场研究档案。该数据由作者对前者和当前住房活动家的深入访谈进行补充。本文认为,城市贫困人口有能力挑战国家镇压和统治阶级意识形态的霸权; evictees等城市运动将被置于社会运动的更广泛的背景下;诸如城市权利之类的概念将被理解为富裕的城市权利讨论的丰富历史;而且跨级联盟是维持城市运动的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号