首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Minimally invasive biomarker studies in eosinophilic esophagitis
【24h】

Minimally invasive biomarker studies in eosinophilic esophagitis

机译:微创生物标志物在嗜酸性食管炎中的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the esophagus that currently requires repeated endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis and monitoring because no reliable noninvasive markers have been identified. ObjectiveTo identify promising minimally invasive EoE biomarkers and remaining gaps in biomarker validation. MethodsWe performed a systematic review of EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to June 6, 2017. Studies were included if patients met the 2007 consensus criteria for EoE diagnosis, a minimally invasive biomarker was assessed, and the study included at least 1 control for comparison. ResultsThe search identified 2094 studies, with 234 reviewed at full-text level, and 49 included in the analysis (20 adult, 19 pediatric, 7 pediatric and adult, and 3 not stated). Most (26 of 49) were published after 2014. Thirty-five studies included healthy controls, 9 analyzed atopic controls, and 29 compared samples from patients with active and inactive EoE. Minimally invasive biomarkers were obtained from peripheral blood (n?=?41 studies), sponge or string samples (n?=?3), oral or throat swab secretions (n?=?2), breath condensate (n?=?2), stool (n?=?2), and urine (n?=?2). The most commonly reported biomarkers were peripheral blood eosinophils (n?=?16), blood and string eosinophil granule proteins (n?=?14), and eosinophil surface or intracellular markers (n?=?12). EoE biomarkers distinguished active EoE from healthy controls in 23 studies, atopic controls in 2 studies, and inactive EoE controls in 20 studies. ConclusionSeveral promising minimally invasive biomarkers for EoE have emerged; however, few are able to differentiate EoE from other atopic diseases.
机译:背景性食管炎(EOE)是食管的慢性炎症性疾病,目前需要重复的内窥镜活组织检查,用于诊断和监测,因为没有发现可靠的非侵入性标记。 ObjectiveTo确定了有希望的微创EOE生物标志物和生物标志物验证中的剩余间隙。方法网络对2017年6月6日开始的Embase,Ovid Medline,Pubmed和科学网进行了系统审查。如果患者遇到2007年的EoE诊断的共识标准,则会评估一项微创生物标志物,并将研究包括在内至少有1个控制进行比较。结果研究确定了2094项研究,在全文水平下审查了234名,分析中包含49名(20名成人,19个儿科,7个儿科和成人,3个未陈述3)。大多数(共49条)发表于2014年后发表。三十五项研究包括健康对照,9分析的特征对照,29例与活性和无效EOE的患者比较的样品。从外周血(n?= 41研究),海绵或串样品(n?=Δ3),口服或喉咙拭子分泌物(n?=Δ2),呼吸冷凝物(n?=?2 ),粪便(n?=?2)和尿液(n?=?2)。最常见的生物标志物是外周血嗜酸性粒细胞(n?=α16),血液和串嗜酸性粒细胞颗粒蛋白(n?=β14)和嗜酸性粒细胞表面或细胞内标记物(n?=Δ12)。 EOE Biomarkers在23项研究中,在23项研究中的健康对照中的活性EOE,在2项研究中的特应性对照,以及20项研究中的无活性EOE控制。结论出现了eoe的最新侵入性生物标志物的承诺;然而,很少有能够区分EOE与其他特应疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号