...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Cost and effectiveness of in-season strategies for coping with weather variability in Pakistan's agriculture
【24h】

Cost and effectiveness of in-season strategies for coping with weather variability in Pakistan's agriculture

机译:应对巴基斯坦农业天气变异性的季节性策略的成本和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Crops are vulnerable to weather hazards throughout the growth season, with periods of heightened risk described as critical moments. Farmers have a number of ex-ante and in-season options for coping with these events, and ex-post adjustments to farm-household portfolios to further limit the impact on livelihoods if these options fail. Adaptation-related research has focussed mainly on ex-ante or ex-post coping strategies, because in-season approaches tend to be seen as a given, meaning their cost effectiveness is ignored. Based on detailed survey data collected from 287 households in four of the main cropping systems in Pakistan, this study evaluates the impact pathways of hazards and the cost effectiveness of in-season coping strategies. Yield losses varied by 10-30% for 43% of the cases and by 31-50% for another 39%, with the most severe losses caused by the compounding effect of two hazards in one crop season or if both crops in a multi-crop rotation were affected simultaneously. In-season coping options were mostly restricted to the early crop stages and constrained by a short window of time for the response. The application of in-season coping strategies resulted in a yield recovery of 40-95%, with an additional cost of 4-34% of the value of recovered yield. The major critical moments identified were the harvest season, with farming often affected by un-seasonal precipitation, and the germination stage, with an additional high risk for low temperatures at high altitude. A better understanding of the differentiated risks and effectiveness of in-season coping strategies could support the promotion of sustainable crop production in similar agro-ecologies. Moreover, the effectiveness of present-day coping strategies, rather than the use of coping approaches itself, could signal a potential ability to adjust to future climate change.
机译:作物易受整个生长季节的天气危害,其风险增加的时期被描述为关键时刻。农民有许多前赌注和季节选择,用于应对这些事件,以及对农场家庭组合的前后调整,如果这些选项失败,将进一步限制对生计的影响。适应相关的研究主要集中在前蚂蚁或前后应对策略上,因为季节性方法往往会被视为给定,这意味着他们的成本效益被忽略了。本研究基于从287家户中收集的详细调查数据,评估了危险的影响途径和季节应对策略的成本效益。屈服损失为43%的病例而变化10-30%,另外39%的31-50%,具有最严重的损失,由一个作物季节的两个危害的复合效果或两种作物在多个中作物旋转同时受到影响。季节性应对选项主要限于早期作物阶段,并受到响应的短时间内的限制。在季节应对策略中的应用导致产量回收率为40-95%,额外成本为回收率值的4-34%。确定的主要关键时刻是收获季节,耕种经常受到未季节性降水的影响和发芽阶段,高海拔低温的高风险。更好地了解季境应对策略的差异化风险和有效性可以支持在类似农业生态学中促进可持续作物生产。此外,当今应对策略的有效性,而不是使用应对方法本身,可以发挥到适应未来气候变化的潜在能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号