首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >Predicting medical emergency team calls, cardiac arrest calls and re-admission after intensive care discharge: creation of a tool to identify at-risk patients
【24h】

Predicting medical emergency team calls, cardiac arrest calls and re-admission after intensive care discharge: creation of a tool to identify at-risk patients

机译:预测医疗紧急团队呼叫,心脏骤停电话和重症监护后重新入场:创建一个识别风险患者的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We aimed to develop a predictive model for intensive care unit (ICU) discharged patients at risk of post-ICU deterioration. We performed a retrospective, single-centre cohort observational study by linking the hospital admission, patient pathology, ICU, and medical emergency team (MET) databases. All patients discharged from the Alfred Hospital ICU to wards between July 2012 and June 2014 were included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of any MET call, cardiac arrest call or ICU re-admission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of outcome and develop a risk-stratification model. Four thousand, six hundred and thirty-two patients were included in the study. Of these, 878 (19%) patients had a MET call, 51 (1.1%) patients had cardiac arrest calls, 304 (6.5%) were re-admitted to ICU during the same hospital stay, and 964 (21%) had MET calls, cardiac arrest calls or ICU re-admission. A discriminatory predictive model was developed (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.72 [95% confidence intervals {CI} 0.70 to 0.73]) which identified the following factors: increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.012 [95% CI 1.007 to 1.017] P0.001), ICU admission with subarachnoid haemorrhage (OR 2.26 [95% CI 1.22 to 4.16] P=0.009), admission to ICU from a ward (OR 1.67 [95% CI 1.31 to 2.13] P0.001), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ill score without the age component (OR 1.005 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.010] P=0.025), tracheostomy on ICU discharge (OR 4.32 [95% CI 2.9 to 6.42] P0.001) and discharge to cardiothoracic (OR 2.43 [95%Cl 1.49 to 3.96] P0.001) or oncology wards (OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.05 to 4.89] P=0.036). Over the two-year period, 361 patients were identified as having a greater than 50% chance of having post-ICU deterioration. Factors are identifiable to predict patients at risk of post-ICU deterioration. This knowledge could be used to guide patient follow-up after ICU discharge, optimise healthcare resources, and improve patient outcomes and service delivery.
机译:我们旨在为重症监护单元(ICU)开发预测模型(ICU)患者患者患者后ICU后劣化。我们通过将医院入学,患者病理,ICU和医疗紧急团队(MET)数据库联系在一起,进行了回顾性的单中心队列观察研究。包括从阿尔弗雷德医院ICU排放到2012年7月至2014年6月的病房的所有患者。主要结果是任何MET呼叫,心脏骤停电话或ICU重新入场的综合终点。多变量逻辑回归分析用于识别结果的预测因子,并发展风险分层模型。研究中包括四千,六百六十二名患者。其中878名(19%)患者召开了召唤,51名(1.1%)患者患有心脏骤停电话,304(6.5%)在同一住院住宿期间对ICU重新录取,964名(21%)达到了呼叫,心脏骤停电话或ICU重新入场。开发了一种歧视性预测模型(接收器下的区域操作特征曲线0.72 [95%置信区间{CI} 0.70至0.73]),其鉴定了以下因素:增加年龄(差距[或] 1.012 [95%CI 1.007至1.017 P <0.001),ICU接受蛛网膜下腔出血(或2.26 [95%[95%CI 1.22至4.16] P = 0.009),从病房(或1.67 [95%CI 1.31至2.13] P <0.001),进入ICU的ICU生理学和慢性健康评估(Apache)没有年龄组分的病得分(或1.005 [95%[95%[95%[95%ci 1.001至1.010] p = 0.025),对ICU放电的气管造口术(或4.32 [95%CI 2.9至6.42] P <0.001)和排放到心脏静脉(或2.43 [95%Cl 1.49至3.96] P <0.001)或肿瘤病房(或2.27 [95%CI 1.05至4.89] P = 0.036)。在两年的时间内,361名患者被确定为具有ICU后劣化的几率大于50%。可识别因素,以预测因ICU后损坏的风险的患者。这种知识可用于引导ICU排放后的患者随访,优化医疗保健资源,并改善患者结果和服务交付。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号