...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Guidelines: Update of US Preventive Services Task Force Policies and Procedures
【24h】

Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Guidelines: Update of US Preventive Services Task Force Policies and Procedures

机译:临床指南的利益冲突:美国预防服务的更新工作队政策和程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) provides independent, objective, and scientifically rigorous recommendations for clinical preventive services. A primary concern is to avoid even the appearance of members having special interests that might influence their ability to judge evidence and formulate unbiased recommendations. The conflicts of interest policy for the USPSTF is described, as is the formal process by which best practices were incorporated to update the policy. The USPSTF performed a literature review, conducted key informant interviews, and reviewed conflicts of interest policies often similar organizations. Important findings included transparency and public accessibility; full disclosure of financial relationships; disclosure of non-financial relationships (that create the potential for bias and compromise a member's objective judgment); disclosure of family members' conflicts of interests; and establishment of appropriate reporting periods. Controversies in best practices include the threshold of financial disclosures, ease of access to conflicts of interest policies and declarations, vague definition of non-financial biases, and request for family members' conflicts of interests (particularly those that are non-financial in nature). The USPSTF conflicts of interest policy includes disclosures for immediate family members, a clear non-financial conflicts of interest definition, long look-back period and application of the policy to prospective members. Conflicts of interest is solicited from all members every 4 months, formally reviewed, adjudicated, and made publicly available. The USPSTF conflicts of interest policy is publicly available as part of the USPSTF Procedure Manual. A continuous improvement process can be applied to conflicts of interest policies to enhance public trust in members of panels, such as the USPSTF, that produce clinical guidelines and recommendations. (c) 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:美国预防性服务工作队(USPSTF)为临床预防服务提供独立,目标和科学严格的建议。主要关注的是避免甚至避免具有可能影响其判断证据能力并制定无偏见的建议的能力的特殊利益的外表。描述了USPSTF的利息政策冲突,正如纳入最佳实践的正式过程,以便更新政策。苏斯普斯特进行了文献综述,进行了关键的信息访谈,并审查了利益冲突通常是类似的组织。重要调查结果包括透明度和公共可访问性;完全披露财务关系;披露非财务关系(创造偏见潜力并妥协成员的客观判决);披露家庭成员利益冲突;并建立适当的报告期。最佳实践中的争议包括财务披露的门槛,易于获取利息政策和宣言冲突,非财务偏见的模糊定义,以及家庭成员的利益冲突(特别是那些非财务本质上的人) 。 USPSTF的利益政策冲突包括立即家庭成员的披露,明确的非财务利益定义冲突,长期回顾期,并将该政策施加到未来成员。每4个月,正式审查,裁决和公开可用,从所有成员征求利息冲突。苏斯普斯特利息策略冲突是公开可用的,作为苏联程序手册的一部分。持续改进过程可应用于利息政策冲突,以加强在苏联等方案成员中加强公众信托,以产生临床指南和建议。 (c)2017年美国预防医学杂志。 elsevier公司发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号