...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse modes of universal adhesives
【24h】

Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse modes of universal adhesives

机译:微调粘合强度与牙本质和自蚀刻的牙釉质与蚀刻和冲洗通用粘合剂的模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the immediate microtensile bond strengths (mu TBSs) of four mild self-etch universal adhesives applied to dentin and enamel with self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques. Methods: Flat middle dentin surfaces from 104 human teeth and two enamel fragments from another 104 human teeth were randomly distributed into eight groups according to the various adhesive systems used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU) [etch-and-rinse mode vs. self-etch mode]; Optibond XTR (OPT) [etch-and-rinse mode vs. self-etch mode]; Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL) [etch-and-rinse mode vs. self-etch mode]; and Adhese Universal (ADH) [etch-and-rinse mode vs. self-etch mode]. After 24 hours of water storage, the bonded sticks were tested for mu TBS. The differences in the pre-test failure and fracture-failure modes were tested by a two-way ANOVA and GEE model analysis. Bond-strength data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA and mixed-model analysis. Results: For dentin, the mean mu TBS was statistically different among the four adhesives, but not different between the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes. For enamel, the mean mu TBS was statistically different among the four adhesives, as Was the application mode. GEE model analysis revealed a statistically significant adhesive failure rate proportion among the four types of adhesives for both enamel and dentin.
机译:目的:比较施加到牙本质和牙釉质的四种温和自蚀刻通用粘合剂的直接微调粘合强度(MU TBS),具有自蚀刻和蚀刻和冲洗技术。方法:根据所用的各种粘合剂系统将来自104人牙齿和两个人牙齿的扁平牙本质表面从104人牙齿和两个牙釉质片段随机分布成8组:苏格兰通用(SBU)[蚀刻和冲洗模式与自蚀刻模式]; Optibond XTR(OPT)[蚀刻和冲洗模式与自蚀刻模式]; ClearFil通用键快(CL)[蚀刻和冲洗模式与自蚀刻模式];和adhese通用(ADH)[蚀刻和冲洗模式与自蚀刻模式]。在储水24小时后,将粘合棒用于MU TBS。通过双向ANOVA和GEE模型分析测试了预测试失败和骨折破坏模式的差异。用双向ANOVA和混合模型分析分析键合强度数据。结果:对于牙本质,平均mU TBS在四种粘合剂中具有统计学不同,但在自蚀刻和蚀刻和冲洗模式之间不具有不同。对于牙釉质,在四个粘合剂中,平均mu TBS在四个粘合剂中具有统计学不同,如应用模式。 GEE模型分析显示了牙釉质和牙本质的四种粘合剂中的统计学上显着的粘合率比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号