首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Novel ceramic primer vs. conventional treatment methods: Effects on roughness and bond strength of all-ceramic restorations
【24h】

Novel ceramic primer vs. conventional treatment methods: Effects on roughness and bond strength of all-ceramic restorations

机译:新型陶瓷底漆与常规处理方法:对全陶瓷修复体的粗糙度和粘合强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the influence of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Methods: 60 lithium disilicate ceramic samples were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions and were divided into six groups according to the surface treatment: Control (C), 5% HF etching for 20 and 60 seconds (E20, E60), Monobond Etch & Prime etching (MEP), Nd:YAG (ND) and Er:YAG (ER) laser irradiation. All groups were treated with a universal primer except group MEP. A self-adhesive resin cement was bonded to all groups. The shear bond strengths of the specimens were measured using a universal testing machine while surface roughness was measured using a profilometer. Results: Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests revealed significant differences (P0.05). The shear bond strength of group E60 was higher than the other groups while surface roughness of groups MEP and ER were highest.
机译:目的:比较各种表面处理对锂静止玻璃陶瓷剪切粘合强度和表面粗糙度的影响。 方法:根据制造商的说明制备60种锂静止型陶瓷样品,并根据表面处理分为六组:对照(C),5%HF蚀刻20和60秒(E20,E20),单胶蚀刻和 Prime蚀刻(MEP),ND:YAG(ND)和ER:YAG(ER)激光辐照。 除MEP小组外,所有群体都会用普遍底漆治疗。 将自粘树脂水泥粘合到所有基团上。 使用通用试验机测量样品的剪切键强度,而使用型材测量表面粗糙度。 结果:Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U测试显示出显着差异(P <0.05)。 E60组的剪切粘合强度高于其他组,而MEP和ER组的表面粗糙度最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号