Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript

Provenzale James M.; Buch Karen; Filippi Christopher G.; Gaskill-Shipley Mary; Hacein-Bey Lotfi; Soares Bruno P.

首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript

【24h】

Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript

机译：对同行评审审查：AJR神经加理学评论者讨论他们评估稿件的方法

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE. This article provides comments from a small group of highly qualified reviewers of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) regarding their approach to assessing manuscripts. The objective is to educate authors about the issues to which reviewers particularly attend and about errors that will decrease the likelihood of publication.

机译：客观的。本文提供了一小组英国克雷涅族学杂志（AJR）的一小组高素质审查员的评论，了解他们评估手稿的方法。目标是教育提交人关于审稿人特别出席的问题以及将降低出版可能性的错误。

著录项

来源
《AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences》 |2020年第1期|共5页
作者
Provenzale James M.; Buch Karen; Filippi Christopher G.; Gaskill-Shipley Mary; Hacein-Bey Lotfi; Soares Bruno P.;
展开▼
作者单位

Duke Univ Med Ctr Dept Radiol Box 3808 Durham NC 27710 USA;

Massachusetts Gen Hosp Dept Radiol Boston MA USA;

Lenox Hill Hosp Northwell Hlth Donald &

Barbara Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell New York NY USA;

Univ Cincinnati Dept Radiol Cincinnati OH USA;

Sutter Hlth Dept Med Imaging Sacramento CA USA;

Univ Vermont Dept Radiol Med Ctr Burlington VT USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类放射医学;
关键词
advice; manuscript; review; reviewers;

机译：建议;稿件;审查;审查员;
入库时间 2022-08-20 00:44:21

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript [J] . Provenzale James M., Buch Karen, Filippi Christopher G., AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences . 2020,第1期

机译：对同行评审审查：AJR神经加理学评论者讨论他们评估稿件的方法
2. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers [J] . James W. Navalta, T. Scott Lyons Advances in physiology education . 2010,第4期

机译：学生对同行评审的决定与教师同行评审一样严格
3. Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited [J] . Clément Lazarus, Romana Haneef, Philippe Ravaud, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . 2016,第期

机译：同行评审员确定了评估治疗干预的非扫描研究的手稿中的旋转，但它们对抽象结论的影响是有限的
4. REGULATORY GUIDE 1.200 PRA PEER REVIEWS A PEER REVIEWER PERSPECTIVE [C] . David J. Finnicum International conference on nuclear engineering;ICONE-16 . 2008

机译：法规指南1.200 PRA同行评审同行评审的观点
5. STATUS-QUALITY SYNERGISMS IN THE PEER REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS [D] . FESTA, ROGER REGINALD 1982

机译：手稿同行评审中的状态质量协同
6. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals [O] . Ketevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, 2019

机译：对同行评审员在生物医学期刊的稿件评审过程中的作用和任务进行范围界定的评审
7. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals [O] . Ketevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, 2019

机译：对生物医学期刊中手稿审查过程中的同行评审员角色和任务的范围

Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅