...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:互动焦虑症的互补和替代医学治疗:随机对照试验的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Introduction The objective was to evaluate efficacy/safety of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) based on randomized controlled trials in adults. Methods Data sources . Six electronic databases (“generalized anxiety (disorder)” and “randomized trial”) and reference lists of identified publications were searched to March 2017. Study selection . Eligibility: full-text publications (English, German language); CAM versus conventional treatment, placebo/sham or no treatment; GAD diagnosed according to standard criteria; and a validated scale for disease severity. Of the 6693 screened records, 32 were included (18 on biologically-based therapies, exclusively herbal preparations; eight on manipulative and body-based therapies; and three on alternative medical systems and three on mind–body therapies). Data extraction . Cochrane Collaboration methodology was used for quality assessment and data extraction. Results Direct comparisons of Kava Kava ( Piper methysticum ) extracts to placebo (4 quality trials, n ?=?233) were highly heterogeneous. Network meta-regression reduced heterogeneity and suggested a modest Kava effect [end-of-treatment Hamilton Anxiety scale score difference adjusted for baseline scores and trial duration: ??3.24 (95% CI ??6.65, 0.17; P ?=?0.059), Kava Kava 4 arms, n ?=?139; placebo 5 arms, n ?=?359]. Lavender ( Lavandula angustifolia ) extract (1 quality trial, 10?weeks, n ?=?523) and a combination of extracts of C. oxycantha , E. californica and magnesium (1 quality trial, 12?weeks, n ?=?264) were superior to placebo and balneotherapy was superior to paroxetine (1 quality trial, 8?weeks, n ?=?237) indicating efficacy. All other trials were small and/or of modest/low quality and/or lacked assay sensitivity. Safety reporting was poor. Conclusion Evidence about efficacy/safety of most CAM methods in GAD is limited. Apparent efficacy of certain herbal preparations and body-based therapies requires further confirmation.
机译:摘要目的是评估基于成人随机对照试验的互补和替代医学(CAM)方法的互补和替代医学(CAM)方法的疗效/安全性。方法数据源。六种电子数据库(“广泛的焦虑(紊乱)”和“随机试验”)和所识别出版物的参考列表进行了检测到2017年3月。学习选择。资格:全文出版物(英语,德语); Cam与常规治疗,安慰剂/假或无治疗; GAD根据标准标准诊断;和疾病严重程度的验证规模。在6693个筛选的记录中,包括32个(在生物学上的疗法上18个,专门的草药制剂;八个关于操纵和基于身体的疗法;和三个在替代医疗系统和三个心态疗法上)。数据提取。 Cochrane协作方法用于质量评估和数据提取。结果Kava Kava(Piper Methysticum)提取物直接比较到安慰剂(4质量试验,N?= 233)是高度异质的。网络元回归减少异质性,并提出了一种适度的Kava效果[治疗结束汉密尔顿焦虑尺度评分差异调整为基线评分和试验持续时间:3.24(95%CI ?? 6.65,0.17; P?= 0.059) ,Kava Kava 4武器,n?=?139;安慰剂5武器,n?= 359]。薰衣草(Lavandula angustifolia)提取物(1质量审判,10?周,N?= 523)以及C. oxycantha,E. Californica和镁的提取物(1质量试验,12?周,N?= 264 )优于安慰剂和秃顶疗法优于帕罗西汀(1质量试验,8?周,N?= 237)表明功效。所有其他试验均小于和/或适度/低质量和/或缺乏测定敏感性。安全报告差。结论GAD中大多数凸轮方法疗效/安全的证据有限。某些草药制剂和基于体疗法的表观疗效需要进一步确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号