...
首页> 外文期刊>Aerosol Science and Technology: The Journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research >Multiple scattering correction factor estimation for aethalometer aerosol absorption coefficient measurement
【24h】

Multiple scattering correction factor estimation for aethalometer aerosol absorption coefficient measurement

机译:用于聚体气旋气雾吸收系数测量的多散射校正因子估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We estimate the multiple scattering correction factor (C-ref), which is an empirical constant required to correct aerosol absorption coefficient (sigma(ap)) measurements for the multiple scattering artifacts of aethalometer, using a multiplier derived from a linear regression method (C-ref(LRL)). Estimated C-ref(LRL) values during the Cheju ABC Plume Monsoon EXperiment (CAPMEX) are 3.99 (405 nm), 4.48 (532 nm), and 5.46 (781 nm) using aethalometer and 3-wavelength PhotoAcoustic Soot Spectrometer (PASS-3). The difference between these C-ref(LRL) values and those of a previous study (C-ref(W03)) are. 8.0% (405 nm), 20.1% (532 nm), and 30.2% (781 nm); the difference is greater at larger wavelengths because the linear regression line intercept is larger. C-ref(W03) varies by up to 121% with increasing aerosol absorption coefficient (rap) at 532 and 781nm, whereas C-ref(LRL) varies by only 36.8%. C-ref(W03) and C-ref(LRL) determined during CAPMEX were applied to year-round aethalometer rap measurements (sigma(W03)(ap) and sigma(LRL)(ap), respectively) at Gosan (GSN), Lulin (LLN), and Alert (ALT) stations. sigma(W03)(ap) and sigma(LRL)(ap) were compared to concurrent rap measurements from Continuous Light Absorption Photometer (CLAP; sigma(ap)(CLAP)). At GSN, the bias difference and root mean square difference of sigma(W03)(ap) from sigma(ap)(CLAP) are. 23.1 and 25.8%; however, those of sigma(LRL)(ap) from sigma(ap)(CLAP) are. 9.0 and 17.9%, respectively. LLN and ALT both exhibit a greater difference between sigma(W03)(ap) and sigma(ap)(CLAP) than between sigma(LRL)(ap) and sigma(ap)(CLAP). This suggests that C-ref(LRL) can be applied to year-round aethalometer measurements. Furthermore, sigma(LRL)(ap) agrees better with sigma(ap)(CLAP) than sigma(W03)(ap) in all three environments.
机译:我们估计多个散射校正因子(C-REF),它是纠正气雾吸收系数(Sigma(AP))测量的多种散射校正因子(C-REF),其使用从线性回归方法的乘数(C -ref(lrl))。 Cheju ABC Plume季风实验(CAPMEX)期间的C-REF(LRL)值是3.99(405nm),4.48(532nm)和5.46(781nm),使用聚体仪表和3波长光声烟灰谱仪(Pass-3 )。这些C-REF(LRL)值与先前研究的差异(C-REF(W03))是。 8.0%(405nm),20.1%(532nm)和30.2%(781nm);在较大波长下差异更大,因为线性回归线截距更大。 C-Ref(W03)随着532和781nm的气溶胶吸收系数(RAP)增加而变化高达121%,而C-Ref(LRL)仅为36.8%。 Capmex中确定的C-REF(W03)和C-REF(LRL)应用于戈萨兰(GSN)的全年的聚体仪表RAP测量(SIGMA(W03)和SIGMA(AP), Lulin(LLN)和警报(ALT)站。将Sigma(W03)(AP)(AP)和Sigma(AP)与来自连续光吸收光度计(拍摄的同时的RAP测量进行比较(苜蓿(AP)(拍摄))。在GSN处,来自Sigma(AP)(拍摄)的Sigma(W03)(AP)的偏差差异和均方差。 23.1和25.8%;但是,来自Sigma(AP)(拍摄)的Sigma(LRL)(AP)的那些是。 9.0和17.9%。 LLN和ALT均在Sigma(LRL)(AP)和Sigma(AP)(拍摄)之间表现出σ(W03)(AP)和Sigma(AP)(拍摄)之间的更大差异。这表明C-REF(LRL)可以应用于全年的聚体仪表测量。此外,SIGMA(LRL)(AP)在所有三种环境中的SIGMA(AP)(AP)(AP)(AP)比SIGMA(AP)(AP)更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号