...
首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >Clear principles are needed for integrity in gambling research
【24h】

Clear principles are needed for integrity in gambling research

机译:在赌博研究中诚信需要明确的原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Commercial gambling is expanding rapidly across the globe. However, the field of gambling research has not kept pace with this expansion, and continues to focus on prevalence studies and individuated treatment regimes, with little attention to the political, economic or technological underpinnings of commercial gambling. The implications of this lack of sophistication in the research agenda are that society is ill-equipped to understand the nature and underlying causes of gambling harms, and how these might best be avoided, minimized or ameliorated. Around the world, various levels of government benefit from gambling revenue, with consequences for the independent regulation of gambling. Further, there is considerable industry influence on the research agenda, often involving similar techniques to those employed previously by the tobacco and alcohol industries to engage researchers. This influence is compounded by a failure of many gambling researchers and journals to adopt traditional academic safeguards, such as the disclosure of conflicts of interest, and by many arguing for a partnership model' with industry to advance the research agenda. This paper identifies five basic principles to restore reasonable standards of integrity in gambling studies: (1) research should not be funded by the proceeds of gambling; (2) research priorities should not be influenced by the beneficiaries of gambling; (3) conferences and other research fora should not be influenced by industry; (4) funding sources should be disclosed in journals and at conferences; and (5) meaningful access to gambling products and environments must be part of licensing. We also propose a range of actions to promote greater transparency and independence in the gambling research field.
机译:商业赌博正在全球迅速扩展。然而,赌博研究领域并没有与这种扩张保持同步,并继续关注流行研究和个性化的治疗制度,几乎没有关注商业赌博的政治,经济或技术基础。这种缺乏复杂性在研究议程中的含义是社会的弊端,以了解赌博危害的性质和根本原因,以及如何最好地避免,最小化或改善这些原因。世界各地,各级政府从赌博收入中受益,后果对赌博的独立监管。此外,对研究议程有相当大的行业影响,通常涉及与以前由烟草和酒精工业雇用的人相似的技术来参与研究人员。这种影响因许多赌博研究人员和期刊的失败而变得复杂,以采用传统的学术保障,例如利益冲突的披露,以及许多与行业进行合作模式,以推进研究议程。本文确定了五项基本原则,以恢复赌博研究中合理的诚信标准:(1)研究不应由赌博所得款项资助; (2)研究优先事项不应受到赌博受益人的影响; (3)会议和其他研究必须受到行业的影响; (4)应在期刊和会议中披露资金来源; (5)有意义地访问赌博产品和环境必须是许可的一部分。我们还提出了一系列行动,以促进赌博研究领域的更大透明度和独立性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号