...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Oto-Laryngologica >Comparison of digital volume tomography and high-resolution computed tomography in detecting superior semicircular canal dehiscence - a temporal bone study
【24h】

Comparison of digital volume tomography and high-resolution computed tomography in detecting superior semicircular canal dehiscence - a temporal bone study

机译:数字体积断层扫描与高分辨率计算断层扫描在检测卓越的半圆形运河裂缝中的比较 - 颞骨研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Conclusion: In detecting a thin bony coverage of a superior semicircular canal (SSC), digital volume tomography (DVT) scans in Poeschl projection seem to be superior to high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans. Still, a definite diagnosis of SSC dehiscence (SSCD) is not possible with any radiologic imaging technique. Objective: To compare CT and DVT to find out whether DVT is equal, better or worse in showing a thin bony layer on top of an SCC. Methods: In 11 human temporal bone specimens, the SSC was microscopically blue-lined leaving a thin bony coverage on top of it. All specimens were assessed with both high-resolution CT and DVT. After reconstructing the images in Stenvers and Poeschl projections, all images were evaluated by five independent examiners experienced in radiologic imaging of the temporal bone using a four-point ordinal scale, from 1 (distinct dehiscence) to 4 (distinct coverage). Results: The mean score for all CT scans was 2.58 compared with 3.22 for DVT scans (p = 0.000). Poeschl projection showed a mean score of 3.25 compared with 2.55 for Stenvers projection (p = 0.000). The best imaging modality was found to be DVT scans in Poeschl projections, with a mean score of 3.60.
机译:结论:在检测较薄的半圆管(SSC)的薄骨覆盖范围内,Poeschl投影中的数字体积断层扫描(DVT)扫描似乎优于高分辨率计算断层扫描(CT)扫描。仍然,对于任何放射学成像技术,不可能实现SSC Dehiscence(SSCD)的明确诊断。目的:比较CT和DVT,了解DVT是否相等,更好或更差,在SCC顶部显示薄骨层。方法:在11个人颞骨标本中,SSC是显微镜蓝衬里,留下薄的骨覆盖物。使用高分辨率CT和DVT来评估所有标本。在旋转器和PoESCH1投影中重建图像后,所有图像通过四点序尺寸,从1(不同的裂开)到4(明显覆盖)来评估颞骨的放射学成像中的五个独立检查员。结果:除了DVT扫描的3.22相比,所有CT扫描的平均得分为2.58(P = 0.000)。 Poeschl投影显示平均得分为3.25,与2.55用于挡锤投影(P = 0.000)。发现最好的成像模块是Poeschl投影中的DVT扫描,平均得分为3.60。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号