首页> 外文期刊>Current Eye Research >Comparison of Autologous Serum Versus Preservative Free Artificial Tear in Patients with Dry Eyes Due to Systemic Isotretinoin Therapy
【24h】

Comparison of Autologous Serum Versus Preservative Free Artificial Tear in Patients with Dry Eyes Due to Systemic Isotretinoin Therapy

机译:患有全身性甲腈治疗患者的自体血清与防腐性无泪的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To investigate dry eye development in the patients receiving systemic retinoic acid therapy and to compare effectiveness of Autologous Serum (AS) and preservative free artificial tear (PFAT) in the patients with dry eye disease.Method: This prospective, crossover, double blind study was conducted on patients who have dry eyes due to systemic isotretinoin treatment for different indications. Patients detected as having dry eye during systemic isotretinoin treatment were included to our study. At baseline, 1 and 2 month of study, detailed ocular examination, best corrected visual acuity measurement, intraocular pressure measurement, and Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer Test (ST) without topical anesthesia were performed. We compared the efficacy of AS and PFAT. To accomplish crossover after the first month, treatment given to each patient was switched to the other treatment. Statistical analysis was measured using SPSS version 20.0. p values of < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.Result: At the end of the first month, there was a significant improvement for the TBUT test in both AS and PFAT groups compared to baseline (respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.001). TBUT was found to be significantly higher in the AS group compared to the PFAT group at the end of the first month (p < 0.001). At the end of the second month, TBUT was found to be significantly higher in the AS group compared to the PFAT group at the posttreatment time (p < 0.001). There was a significant OSDI score decreasing in both groups compared to that reported previously at the end of the first and second months (respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.001). OSDI score decreasing was more significant in the AS group compared to the PFAT group at both time points (respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.001).Conclusion: AS may be an effective alternative to PFAT in the treatment of dry eye developed during isotretinoin use
机译:目的:探讨接受全身性视黄酸治疗患者的干眼发育,并比较干眼症患者自体血清(AS)和防腐剂免费人工撕裂(PFAT)的效果。方法:这种前景,交叉,双盲由于对不同适应症的系统性异丙键治疗而具有干燥眼睛的患者进行了研究。在我们的研究中纳入了在系统性异黄素治疗期间检测到患有干眼症的患者。在基线,1和2个月的学习,详细的眼科检查,最佳校正的视力测量,眼压测量和撕裂时间(TBUT)和席石体试验(ST),没有局部麻醉。我们比较了和pfat的功效。为了在第一个月完成交叉,对每个患者的治疗切换到其他治疗。使用SPSS版本20.0测量统计分析。 P值<0.05被认为是统计学上的显着性。结果:在第一个月结束时,与基线(分别P <0.001,P <0.001)相比,AS和PFAT组的TBUT测试有显着改善。与第一个月末的PFAT组相比,当AS组中发现TBUT显着高(P <0.001)。在第二个月结束时,与PFAT组在后处理时间(P <0.001)的PFAT组相比,TBUT在AS组中被发现显着更高。与先前在第一和第二个月结束时(分别为P <0.001,P <0.001),这两个群体中两组有显着的OSDI评分减少。与群体相比,与PFAT组相比,欧洲欧洲欧洲孔的得分减少在两个时间点(分别为P <0.001,P <0.001)。结论:由于在异黄素使用期间,可以是PFAT的有效替代方法

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号