...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >A cost-effectiveness analysis of calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam versus gel for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis
【24h】

A cost-effectiveness analysis of calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam versus gel for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis

机译:Calcipotriol Plus Betamhethasone双丙酸盐气溶胶泡沫对凝胶的成本效益分析,用于牙龈牙釉质的局部处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Calcipotriol 50 mu g/g and betamethasone 0.5mg/g dipropionate (Cal/BD) aerosol foam formulation provides greater effectiveness and improved patient preference compared with traditional Cal/BD formulations for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis.Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of Cal/BD foam compared with Cal/BD gel from the Australian perspective.Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of topical Cal/BD foam and gel for the treatment of people with plaque psoriasis. Treatment effectiveness, safety, and utilities were based on a randomized control trial, resource use was informed by expert opinion, and unit costs were obtained from public sources. Outcomes were reported in terms of 1-year costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. All costs were reported in 2017 Australian Dollars.Results: The model showed that patients using Cal/BD foam had more QALYs and higher costs over 1 year compared with patients using Cal/BD gel, resulting in a cost of $13,609 per QALY gained at 4-weeks. When 4 weeks of Cal/BD foam was compared with 8 weeks of Cal/BD gel treatment, Cal/BD foam was $8 less expensive and resulted in 0.006 more QALYs gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that, compared with Cal/BD ointment, Cal/BD foam was associated with an incremental cost of $15,091 per QALY gained.Conclusion: Cal/BD foam is the most cost-effective Cal/BD formulation for the topical treatment of patients with plaque psoriasis.
机译:背景:Calcipotriol50μg/ gβ0.5mg/ g二丙酮(Cal / Bd)气溶胶泡沫配方提供更大的有效性和改善的患者偏好,与传统的Cal / BD配方相比,用于斑块牛皮癣的局部治疗。目的:确定CAL / BD泡沫的成本效益与澳大利亚透视的CAL / BD凝胶相比。方法:Markov模型是为评估局部Cal / BD泡沫和凝胶治疗斑块牛皮癣的凝胶的成本效益。治疗效率,安全和公用事业基于随机对照试验,资源使用由专家意见书通知,从公共来源获得单位费用。在1年的成本,质量调整的终身年度和增量成本效益比率方面报告了结果。所有费用均为2017年报告澳元。结果:与使用CAL / BD凝胶的患者相比,使用CAL / BD泡沫的患者具有更多的QALYS和更高的成本,而且每年QALY的成本为13,609美元-weeks。当Cal / BD泡沫的4周与Cal / BD凝胶处理的8周进行比较时,Cal / BD泡沫耗费8美元,导致0.006的Qalys获得。敏感性分析表明,与CAR / BD软膏相比,CAL / BD泡沫与每QALY的增量成本为15,091美元。结论:CAL / BD泡沫是最具成本效益的CAL / BD配方,用于术语局部治疗术语用斑块性牛皮癣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号