首页> 外文期刊>Acta odontologica Scandinavica. >Quality of root fillings performed with two root filling techniques. An in vitro study using micro-CT
【24h】

Quality of root fillings performed with two root filling techniques. An in vitro study using micro-CT

机译:用两种根部填充技术进行根部填充的质量。使用micro-CT的体外研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the presence of voids in root fillings performed in oval and ribbon-shaped canals with two root filling techniques, lateral compaction technique (LCT) or hybrid technique (HT), a combination of a gutta-percha masterpoint and thermoplastic gutta-percha. Furthermore, the obturation time for the two techniques was evaluated. Materials and methods. Sixty-seven roots with oval and ribbon-shaped canals were prepared using Profile Ni-Ti rotary files. After preparation, the roots were randomly allocated to two groups according to root filling technique. All roots were filled with AH plus and gutta-percha. Group 1 was filled using LCT in = 34) and group 2 was filled using HT (n = 33). The obturation time was measured in 30 cases evenly distributed between the two techniques. Voids in relation to the root canal fillings were assessed using cross-section images from Micro-computed Tomography scans. Results. All root canal fillings had voids. Permutation test showed no statistically significant difference between the two root filling techniques in relation to presence of voids (p = 0.092). A statistically significant difference in obturation time between the two techniques was found (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The present study found no statistically significant difference in percentage of voids between two root filling techniques. A 40% reduction in obturation time was found for the HT compared to the LCT.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是用两种牙根充填技术,即侧压实技术(LCT)或混合技术(HT),结合牙龈胶合母胶,来比较在椭圆形和带状运河中进行的牙根充填中是否存在空隙和热塑性牙胶。此外,评估了两种技术的封闭时间。材料和方法。使用Profile Ni-Ti旋转锉制备了67个带有椭圆形和带状根管的牙根。准备后,根部根据根部填充技术随机分为两组。所有的根都充满了AH plus和古塔胶。第一组使用LCT in = 34填充,而第二组使用HT(n = 33)填充。在两种技术之间平均分配的30例中,测量了闭塞时间。使用来自微计算机断层扫描的横截面图像评估与根管充盈有关的空隙。结果。所有的根管充填物都有空隙。置换测试表明,两种根填充技术之间在空隙方面均无统计学上的显着差异(p = 0.092)。发现这两种技术之间的闭塞时间有统计学差异(p <0.001)。结论。本研究发现两种根填充技术之间的空隙百分比没有统计学上的显着差异。与LCT相比,HT的闭孔时间减少了40%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号