首页> 外文期刊>Acta oecologica >Influence of edge on predator-prey distribution and abundance
【24h】

Influence of edge on predator-prey distribution and abundance

机译:边缘对捕食者-猎物的分布和丰度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I investigated the effect of spatial configuration on distribution and abundance of invertebrate trophic groups by counting soil arthropods under boxes (21 x 9.5 cm) arranged in six different patterns that varied in the amount of edge (137-305 cm). I predicted fewer individuals from the consumer trophic group (Collembola) in box groups with greater amount of edge. This prediction was based on the assumption that predators (mites, ants, spiders, centipedes) select edge during foraging and thereby reduce abundance of the less mobile consumer group under box patterns with greater edge. Consumer abundance (Collembola) was not correlated with amount of edge. Among the predator groups, mite, ant and centipede abundance related to the amount of edge of box groups. However, in contrast to predictions, abundance of these predators was negatively correlated with amount of edge in box patterns. All Collembola predators, with the exception of ants, were less clumped in distribution than Collembola. The results are inconsistent with the view that predators used box edges to predate the less mobile consumer trophic group. Alternative explanations for the spatial patterns other than predator-prey relations include (1) a negative relationship between edge and moisture, (2) a positive relationship between edge and detritus decomposition (i.e. mycelium as food for the consumer group), and (3) a negative relationship between edge and the interstices between adjacent boxes. Landscape patterns likely affect microclimate, food, and predator-prey relations and, therefore, future experimental designs need to control these factors individually to distinguish among alternative hypotheses. (C) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
机译:我通过计算盒子(21 x 9.5 cm)下的土壤节肢动物的数量来研究空间构型对无脊椎动物营养群体分布和丰富度的影响,盒子以六种不同的模式排列,边缘的数量不同(137-305 cm)。我预测来自消费者营养组(Collembola)的盒子组中具有较少优势的个人会更少。该预测基于以下假设:捕食者(螨虫,蚂蚁,蜘蛛,cent)在觅食期间选择边缘,从而在边缘较大的盒子模式下减少移动性较弱的消费群体的数量。消费者的消费量(Collembola)与边缘数量无关。在捕食者群体中,螨,蚂蚁和cent的丰度与盒子群体的边缘数量有关。但是,与预测相反,这些捕食者的丰富度与盒子模式中的边缘数量呈负相关。除蚂蚁外,所有Collembola捕食者的分布都比Collembola少。结果与捕食者使用箱形边缘早于流动性较弱的消费者营养群体的观点不一致。除捕食者与猎物之间的关系以外,其他有关空间格局的解释包括:(1)边缘与水分之间的负相关;(2)边缘与碎屑分解之间的正相关(即菌丝体作为消费群体的食物);以及(3)边缘与相邻盒子之间的间隙之间呈负相关。景观格局可能会影响小气候,食物和食肉动物与猎物的关系,因此,未来的实验设计需要单独控制这些因素,以区分其他假设。 (C)2004 Elsevier SAS。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号