首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Dealing with the Criterion Problem by Measuring the Quality and Quantity of Creative Activity and Accomplishment
【24h】

Dealing with the Criterion Problem by Measuring the Quality and Quantity of Creative Activity and Accomplishment

机译:通过衡量创造性活动和成就的质量和数量来处理标准问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The criterion problem was one of the focal points of early studies of creativity, but several useful criteria have been developed in the last few decades. The investigation reported here represents additional progress. This report (a) describes a new quality of creative achievement index for each domain of the Creative Activity and Accomplishment Checklist (CAAC); (b) compares quality and quantity of creative activity and accomplishment using CAAC data from 202 students; and (c) introduces 2 new scales for the CAAC, one representing everyday creativity and the other technological creativity. The advantages of the modified CAAC include the assessment of both quality (i.e., socially recognized) and quantity of creative achievement, as well as additional breadth in the domains that can be reliably assessed. Analyses of CAAC data confirmed that (a) all domains, including everyday and technological creativity, were reliable in the sample of students and (b) the quality of creative activity did indeed differ from its quantity. There were few sex differences, but boys outperformed girls in technological creativity and girls outperformed boys in the arts. Limitations and future research are noted.
机译:标准问题是创造力早期研究的焦点之一,但在过去的几十年里,已经开发了几个有用的标准。这里报告的调查代表了其他进展。本报告(a)描述了创造性活动和成就清单(CAAC)的每个领域的创造性成就指数的新质量; (b)比较来自202名学生的CAAC数据的创造性活动和完成创造性活动的质量和数量; (c)为CAAC引入了2个新秤,其中一个代表日常创造力和其他技术创造力。改进的CAAC的优势包括评估质量(即社会认可)和创造性成果的数量,以及可以可靠地评估的域中的额外宽度。 CAAC数据的分析证实(a)所有域名,包括日常和技术创造力,在学生和(b)的样本中是可靠的,(b)创造性活动的质量确实不同于其数量。性别差异很少,但男孩在技术创造力和女孩方面表现优于艺术中的男孩。注意到局限性和未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号