首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Are Individuals with Schizophrenia or Schizotypy More Creative? Evidence from Multiple Tests of Creative Potential
【24h】

Are Individuals with Schizophrenia or Schizotypy More Creative? Evidence from Multiple Tests of Creative Potential

机译:是有精神分裂症或斯派比的个体更具创造力吗? 来自多次创造性潜力测试的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Schizophrenia and schizotypy have been often associated with above average creativity; however, empirical studies on the relationship between schizophrenia spectrum disorders and enhanced creativity generated inconsistent results. This research investigates if the association between schizophrenia spectrum disorders and creative potential levels is dependent upon which cognitive processes are examined during administered tests of creative potential. Our study examined 117 participants stratified into the following three subgroups: (a) 39 psychometrically determined low-schizotypal individuals, (b) 35 psychometrically determined high-schizotypal individuals, and (c) 43 patients with schizophrenia. Each participant completed 2 divergent thinking (DT) tasks, 2 convergent thinking (CT) tasks, and 2 creative tasks that combine both DT and CT processes. The data suggest that Group C had typical abilities in the DT, CT, and the combined creative thinking tasks; however, the group as a whole had intact originality during the Figural Completion (DT task) and the Tangram Construction (combined task). Notably, Group B showed significant advantages in both verbal and figural DT tasks. Group A and Group B demonstrated no significant differences in the creative thinking processes of CT; however, both groups outperformed Group C in these tasks.
机译:精神分裂症和斯派比斯经常与高于平均的创造力相关;然而,对精神分裂症谱系障碍和增强创造力之间关系产生的实证研究产生了不一致的结果。该研究调查了精神分裂症谱系障碍和创造性潜在水平之间的关联取决于在施用创造潜力的测试期间检查认知过程。我们的研究检测了117名分层分层的参与者分为以下三个亚组:(a)39精神度测定的低酶个体,(b)35精神度确定的高鞘型个体,和(c)43例精神分裂症患者。每个参与者完成了2个发散思维(DT)任务,2个会聚思维(CT)任务,以及组合DT和CT流程的2个创意任务。数据表明,C组在DT,CT和合并的创意思维任务中具有典型的能力;但是,整个组的组在图中完成了(DT任务)和Tangram建设(组合任务)的完整原创性。值得注意的是,B组在口头和图解DT任务中显示出显着的优势。 A组和B组在CT的创意思维过程中显示出没有显着差异;但是,这两个组都在这些任务中表现优于C组。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Creativity Research Journal》 |2017年第2期|共12页
  • 作者单位

    East China Normal Univ Shanghai Peoples R China;

    East China Normal Univ Shanghai Peoples R China;

    East China Normal Univ Shanghai Peoples R China;

    Univ Connecticut Storrs CT USA;

    Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr Shanghai Peoples R China;

    East China Normal Univ Shanghai Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 管理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 00:11:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号