首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Comparative Analysis of Different Creativity Tests for the Prediction of Students' Scientific Creativity
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Different Creativity Tests for the Prediction of Students' Scientific Creativity

机译:对学生科学创造力预测不同创造性试验的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study aimed to explore different scientific creativity tests' prediction of students' science performance and domain-general creativity abilities. Two scientific creativity tests were chosen: the "Scientific Creativity Test" and the "Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT)". The Science Performance Test (SPT) and Domain-General Creativity Test (DGCT) were also adapted to allow a check of the correlation between students' scientific creativity, science performance, and general creativity. Sixty junior high school students participated in this study by taking these four tests. Each test needed to be completed within 30 minutes, and the interval between each test was 2 weeks. The results showed that both the students' science performance and domain-general creativity could reflect their performance of scientific creativity better in the scores of the "Scientific Creativity Test" than in those of the C-SAT. Limitations are discussed.
机译:本研究旨在探讨不同的科学创造性测试对学生科学绩效和领域一般创造能力的预测。 选择了两项科学创意测试:“科学创意测试”和“创造性科学能力测试(C-SAT)”。 科学性能测试(SPT)和领域一般创造性测试(DGCT)也适用于检查学生科学创意,科学表现和一般创造力之间的相关性。 六十名初中学生通过服用这四次测试参加了这项研究。 需要在30分钟内完成每种测试,每个测试之间的间隔为2周。 结果表明,学生的科学绩效和领域一般创造力都可以在“科学创意测试”的分数上更好地反映他们的科学创造力的表现,而不是在C-SAT的分数。 讨论了局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号