【24h】

Ultrasound weight estimation of large fetuses

机译:大胎儿的超声重量估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. To compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation in large fetuses using four ultrasound formulae. Design. Prospective comparative study. Setting. University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Population. Large-for-gestational age fetuses (n= 114) at a routine ultrasound examination in the third trimester. Methods. The Persson & Weldner two-dimensional formula was compared with the Hart et al. two-dimensional formula incorporating maternal weight and with the Lee et al. and Lindell & Mar?ál three-dimensional formulae. The formulae are based on two-dimensional measurements of fetal head, abdomen and femur, and three-dimensional volumetry of fetal abdomen and thigh. Main outcome measures. Accuracy in detection of fetuses with birthweight >4000 and >4500 g. Results. For fetuses >4000 g, the Lindell & Mar?ál three-dimensional formula showed significantly smaller mean absolute percentage error than the Persson & Weldner two-dimensional and the Lee et al. three-dimensional formulae (p= 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference between the Lindell & Mar?ál three-dimensional and the Hart et al. two-dimensional formulae was found. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed a higher detection rate for fetuses with birthweight >4500 g using a three-dimensional compared with a two-dimensional technique. The best performance in detecting fetuses with birthweight >4500 g was given by the Lindell & Mar?ál three-dimensional formula; for estimated fetal weight >4300 g, the detection rate was 93% and false-positive rate 38%. Conclusions. The ability to detect macrosomic fetuses in a preselected high-risk group was higher using fetal weight estimation with a three-dimensional compared with a two-dimensional ultrasound technique, with or without the inclusion of maternal weight.
机译:目的。为了比较使用四个超声公式计算大胎儿胎儿体重的准确性。设计。前瞻性比较研究。设置。瑞典隆德大学医院。人口。妊娠晚期常规超声检查发现胎龄较大的胎儿(n = 114)。方法。将Persson&Weldner二维公式与Hart等人进行了比较。结合了母体重量和李等人的二维公式。和Lindell&Mar?ál三维公式。该公式基于胎儿头,腹部和股骨的二维测量,以及胎儿腹部和大腿的三维容积。主要观察指标。出生体重> 4000和> 4500 g的胎儿的检测准确性。结果。对于> 4000 g的胎儿,Lindell&Mar?al三维公式显示的平均绝对百分比误差明显小于Persson&Weldner二维和Lee等人。三维公式(分别为p = 0.04和p <0.001)。 Lindell和Mar?ál三维模型与Hart等人之间没有显着差异。找到了二维公式。与二维技术相比,使用三维技术对出生体重> 4500 g的胎儿的接收器工作特性曲线显示出更高的检测率。 Lindell&Mar?ál三维公式可为检测出生体重> 4500 g的胎儿提供最佳性能。估计胎儿体重> 4300 g时,检出率为93%,假阳性率为38%。结论与二维超声技术相比,无论是否包含母体体重,使用三维三维胎儿权重估计功能,对预选高危组中的大型胎儿的检测能力更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号