首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >The medical emergency team call: A sentinel event that triggers goals of care discussion
【24h】

The medical emergency team call: A sentinel event that triggers goals of care discussion

机译:医疗紧急团队致电:触发护理讨论目标的一个哨兵活动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: Several studies have questioned the effectiveness of rapid-response systems when measured by outcomes such as decreased overall hospital mortality or cardiac arrest rates. We studied an alternative outcome of rapid-response system implementation, namely, its effect on goals of care and designation of do not resuscitate. DESIGN:: Retrospective chart review. SETTING:: Veterans Administration Hospital in New York City. SUBJECTS:: All patients requiring a medical emergency team call. INTERVENTIONS:: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: Monthly hospital census and discharge data, death occurrences, and do-not-resuscitate order placements were collected over an 8-year pre-medical emergency team and 5-year post-medical emergency team period. All medical emergency team calls and subsequent transfers to a critical care unit were reviewed and correlated to the placement and timing of do-not-resuscitate orders. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the medical emergency team implementation on the change in trend of do-not-resuscitate orders and the hospital mortality. A total of 390 medical emergency team calls were associated with 109 do-not-resuscitate orders (28%). Of the 209 medical emergency team calls (54%) resulting in transfer to a critical care unit, 66 were associated with do-not-resuscitate orders, 73% of which were obtained after transfer. The odds of becoming do not resuscitate for a patient going to the ICU after the medical emergency team call were 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6-5.5; p = 0.001) times greater than for patients staying on the floors after the medical emergency team call. The medical emergency team implementation significantly changed the trend of do-not-resuscitate orders (p < 0.001) but had no impact on hospital mortality rate (p = 0.638). CONCLUSION:: Implementation of a rapid-response system was associated with an increase in do-not-resuscitate order placement. As a sentinel event, medical emergency team activation and transfer to a critical care unit foster consideration of goals of care and frequently results in a transition to a palliative care strategy.
机译:目的::几项研究质疑快速响应系统的有效性,当诸如整体医院死亡率降低或心脏滞留率下降等结果时。我们研究了快速响应系统实施的替代结果,即其对护理目标的影响和不复苏的指定。设计::回顾性图表评论。环境::退伍军人管理医院在纽约市。主题::所有需要医疗紧急团队的患者。干预措施::无测量和主要结果::每月医院人口普查和排放数据,死亡事件和不复苏订单收集在8年后的医疗后的紧急团队和5年后医疗后急救队期间。所有医疗紧急团队呼叫和随后转移到关键护理单元的审查,并与Do-Not-Not-Respscited订单的安置和时间相关联。中断的时间序列分析用于评估医疗紧急团队实施对Do-Not-Resusing命令和医院死亡率变化的影响。共有390名医疗紧急团队呼叫与109个不复苏订单(28%)相关联。在209名医疗紧急团队的呼叫中(54%)导致转移到关键护理单位,66个与不复苏订单有关,其中73%在转移后获得。在医疗紧急团队呼叫之后,成为患者的患者的可能性不会复苏2.9(95%CI,1.6-5.5; p = 0.001)比医疗紧急团队呼叫后患者保持在地板上的患者。医疗紧急团队实施显着改变了不复苏订单的趋势(P <0.001),但对医院死亡率没有影响(P = 0.638)。结论::快速响应系统的实施与Do-Not-Respscited命令放置的增加有关。作为一个Sentinel事件,医疗紧急团队激活和转移到一个关键护理单位促进关心的目标,经常导致过渡到姑息治疗战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号