...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica: Official Publication of the Nordisk Forening for Obstetrik och Gynekologi >Validation study of uterine rupture registration in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway
【24h】

Validation study of uterine rupture registration in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway

机译:挪威医疗出生登记处子宫破裂登记的验证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To validate uterine rupture registration in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) between 1999 and 2008, and to identify rupture type and causes of incorrect or missed registration during 1967-2008. Design Population-based study. Population The validation sample was 392 958 maternities from 21 maternity units registered in MBRN and local Patient Administration Systems in 1999-2008. In addition we identified type of rupture and causes of incorrect registration among 2 422 934 maternities from 48 units, and 1 449 201 maternities from 21 units during 1967-2008. Methods Information about uterine rupture in MBRN was compared with information in medical records. Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of uterine rupture registration in MBRN. Results In 1999-2008, there were 10 false positive cases among 151 uterine ruptures registered in MBRN. In addition, 82 ruptures not registered in MBRN, were identified through Patient Administration Systems. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the MBRN to detect uterine rupture was 63.2, 99.99, 93.4 and 99.98%, respectively. The incidence of uterine rupture changed after correction from 0.38 to 0.56/1000. During 1967-2008, false positive cases (125) were mainly due to wrong coding by MBRN. Around 60% of 141 false negative cases were due to lack of reporting by maternity units. Complete rupture accounted for 63.9% of ruptures registered in MBRN. Conclusions The validity of MBRN data on uterine rupture is not optimal, diagnosis being under-reported by around 37%. Ticked boxes may improve the quality of registration.
机译:目的在1999年至2008年期间验证挪威医疗出生登记处(MBRN)的子宫破裂登记,并确定1967-2008年间破裂类型以及登记不正确或遗漏的原因。设计基于人群的研究。人群验证样本为1999-2008年在MBRN和当地患者管理系统中注册的21个产科的392958例妊娠。此外,我们在1967-2008年间从48个单位的2 422 934个到期日和21个单位的1 449 201个到期日中确定了破裂类型和未正确注册的原因。方法将MBRN中子宫破裂的信息与病历中的信息进行比较。主要结局指标MBRN中子宫破裂登记的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值。结果1999-2008年,MBRN登记的151例子宫破裂中有10例假阳性病例。此外,通过患者管理系统发现了82例未在MBRN中记录的破裂。 MBRN检测子宫破裂的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为63.2、99.99、93.4和99.98%。校正后子宫破裂的发生率从0.38变为0.56 / 1000。 1967-2008年期间,误报案例(125)主要是由于MBRN编码错误。 141例假阴性病例中约有60%是由于妇产科缺乏报告。完全破裂占在MBRN中登记的破裂的63.9%。结论MBRN数据在子宫破裂中的有效性不是最佳的,诊断漏报率约为37%。勾选方框可以提高注册质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号