...
首页> 外文期刊>Comparative exercise physiology >The effects of ankle protectors on lower limb kinematics in male football players: a comparison to braced and unbraced ankles
【24h】

The effects of ankle protectors on lower limb kinematics in male football players: a comparison to braced and unbraced ankles

机译:踝保护剂对男性足球运动员下肢运动学的影响:与支撑和絮凝脚踝的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Football (soccer) players have a high risk of injuring the lower extremities. To reduce the risk of ankle inversion injuries ankle braces can be worn. To reduce the risk of ankle contusion injuries ankle protectors can be utilised. However, athletes can only wear one of these devices at a time. The effects of ankle braces on stance limb kinematics has been extensively researched, however ankle protectors have had little attention. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effects of ankleprotectors on lower extremity kinematics during the stance phase of jogging and compare them with braced and uncovered ankles. Twelve male participants ran at 3.4 m/s in three test conditions; ankle braces (BRACE), ankle protectors (PROTECTOR) and withuncovered ankles (WITHOUT). Stance phase kinematics were collected using an eight-camera motion capture system. Kinematic data between conditions were analysed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. The results showed that BRACE (absolute range of motion(ROM) = 10.72° and relative ROM = 10.26°) significantly (,P<0.05) restricted the ankle in the coronal plane when compared to PROTECTOR (absolute ROM=13.44° and relative ROM =12.82°) and WITHOUT (absolute ROM=13.64° and relative ROM=13.10°). It wasalso found that both BRACE (peak dorsiflexion= 17.02° and absolute ROM=38.34°) and PROTECTOR (peak dorsiflexion =18.46° and absolute ROM =40.15°) significantly (P<0.05) reduced sagittal plane motion when compared to WITHOUT (peak dorsiflexion =19.20° and absolute ROM =42.66°). Ankle protectors' effects on lower limb kinematics closely resemble that of an unbraced ankle. Therefore, ankle protectors should only be used as a means to reduce risk of ankle contusion injuries and not implemented as a method to reduce the risk of ankle inversion injuries. Furthermore, the reductions found in sagittal plane motion of the ankle could possibly increase the bodies energy demand needed for locomotion when ankle protectors are utilised.
机译:足球(足球)球员有很高的风险伤害下肢。为了降低脚踝反转伤害的风险,踝括号可以佩戴。为了降低踝关节挫伤的风险,可以使用脚踝保护器。然而,运动员一次只能佩戴其中一个设备。踝括号对静态肢体运动学的影响已被广泛研究,然而脚踝保护器很少关注。因此,目前的研究旨在探讨踝关节保护剂对慢跑阶段阶段的下肢运动学的影响,并将它们与支撑和未覆盖的脚踝进行比较。十二名男性参与者在三个测试条件下跑3.4米/秒;脚踝括号(支撑),脚踝保护器(保护器)和带外形脚踝(没有)。使用八相拍摄运动捕获系统收集姿态相位运动学。使用单向反复测量Anova分析条件之间的运动数据。结果表明,与保护器相比= 12.82°),没有(绝对rom = 13.64°和相对rom = 13.10°)。它发现,两个支撑(峰值背屈= 17.02°和绝对rom = 38.34°)和保护器(峰值背屈= 18.46°和绝对rom = 40.15°)显着(p <0.05)与没有(峰值峰值)减少矢状平面运动Dorsiflexion = 19.20°和绝对rom = 42.66°)。脚踝保护器对下肢运动学的影响非常类似于横向踝关节。因此,脚踝保护剂应该只用作减少踝关节挫伤损伤的风险的手段,而不是实施以降低踝关节逆转伤风险的方法。此外,踝关节的矢状平面运动中发现的减少可能会增加当使用脚踝保护器时运动所需的主体能量需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Comparative exercise physiology》 |2017年第4期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences School of Sport and Wellbeing University of Central Lancashire Fylde road Preston PR1 2HE Lancashire United Kingdom;

    Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences School of Sport and Wellbeing University of Central Lancashire Fylde road Preston PR1 2HE Lancashire United Kingdom;

    School of Health Sciences University of Salford M5 4WT Manchester United Kingdom;

    Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences School of Sport and Wellbeing University of Central Lancashire Fylde road Preston PR1 2HE Lancashire United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 畜牧、动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂;
  • 关键词

    biomechanics; motion analysis; ankle braces; ankle protectors; football; soccer;

    机译:生物力学;运动分析;脚踝括号;脚踝保护器;足球;足球;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号