首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnic and Histochemistry >Conventional xylene and xylene-free methods for routine histopathological preparation of tissue sections
【24h】

Conventional xylene and xylene-free methods for routine histopathological preparation of tissue sections

机译:常规组织切片常规组织病理学制备的常规二甲苯和无二甲苯方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Xylene customarily has been used as a clearing agent for routine tissue processing. Because xylene is a relatively hazardous solvent, laboratories are under pressure to seek less toxic alternatives for routine use. We prepared 30 paired soft tissue specimens for routine histopathological evaluation using conventional xylene and xylene-free methods to evaluate and compare their efficacy for fixation, processing, embedding, staining and turnaround time. All specimens were measured before and after processing. Three pathologists evaluated and scored the histological sections. Tissue shrinkage was greater when using the xylene method compared to the xylene-free method. The quality of tissue sections including tissue architecture; quality of staining; preservation of epithelial, fibrous, glandular, muscle and adipose tissue; inflammatory cells; and vascular tissue was better after using the xylene method, but differences were not statistically significant. Xylene-free method produced adequate results that nearly equaled the xylene method. Added advantages included cost effectiveness, better working atmosphere and decreased toxicity.
机译:二甲苯通常已用作常规组织处理的清洁剂。由于二甲苯是一种相对危险的溶剂,因此实验室承受着寻找毒性较小的常规使用替代品的压力。我们使用常规的二甲苯和无二甲苯方法制备了30个成对的软组织标本,用于常规组织病理学评估,以评估和比较它们在固定,加工,包埋,染色和周转时间方面的功效。在处理之前和之后测量所有样品。三名病理学家对组织切片进行了评估和评分。与无二甲苯法相比,使用二甲苯法时组织收缩更大。组织切片的质量,包括组织结构;染色质量;保存上皮,纤维,腺,肌肉和脂肪组织;炎性细胞;使用二甲苯法后血管组织更好,但差异无统计学意义。无二甲苯方法产生的结果几乎与二甲苯方法相当。附加的优点包括成本效益,更好的工作环境和降低的毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号