首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Can Multimodal Pain Management in TKA Eliminate Patient-controlled Analgesia and Femoral Nerve Blocks?
【24h】

Can Multimodal Pain Management in TKA Eliminate Patient-controlled Analgesia and Femoral Nerve Blocks?

机译:TKA中的多峰疼痛管理消除患者控制的镇痛和股骨神经块吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundTKA pain management protocols vary widely with no current consensus on a standardized pain management regimen. Multimodal TKA pain management protocols aim to address pain control, facilitate functional recovery, and maintain patient satisfaction.Questions/purposes(1) Did changes to our pain management protocol, specifically adding liposomal bupivacaine, eliminating patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and discontinuing femoral nerve blocks (FNBs), affect narcotic consumption after TKA? (2) Did these changes to our pain management protocols affect patient-reported pain scores? (3) Does the use of an immediate postoperative PCA affect rapid rehabilitation and functional recovery? (4) How did changes to our pain management regimen affect discharge disposition and pain-related Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores?MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed an institutional arthroplasty database between September 2013 and September 2015 containing 1808 patients who underwent primary TKA. Departmental pain management protocols were compared in 6-month periods as the protocol changed. All patients received a multimodal pain management protocol including preoperative oral medications, spinal or general anesthesia, a short-acting intraoperative pericapsular injection, and continued postoperative oral narcotics for breakthrough pain. From September 2013 to April 2014, all patients received an intraoperative FNB and a PCA for the first 24 hours postoperatively (Cohort 1). From May 2014 to October 2014, a periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine was added to the protocol and FNBs were discontinued (Cohort 2). After April 2015, PCA was eliminated (Cohort 3). No other major changes were made to the TKA pain management pathways. Narcotic use, pain scores on 8-hour intervals, physical therapy milestones, and discharge disposition were compared.ResultsTotal narcotic use was the least in Cohort 3 (Cohort 3: 66 54 morphine milligram equivalents versus Cohort 2: 82 72 versus Cohort 1: 96 +/- 62; p 0.001). There was an increase in pain score immediately after surgery in Cohort 3 (4.0 +/- 3.5 versus 1.2 +/- 2.2 versus 1.2 +/- 2.5, post hoc analysis of Cohort 2 versus 3: mean difference 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.0; p 0.001); however, it was not different for the remainder of the hospital stay. Patients who did not receive PCA reached functional milestones for both gait and stairs faster by postoperative day 1 (47% [328 of 698] versus 30% [158 of 527] versus 16% [93 of 583], p 0.001; Cohort 3 versus 2: odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.6; p 0.001). Discharge to home occurred more frequently (84% [583 of 698] versus 78% [410 of 527] versus 72% [421 of 583], p = 0.010) in Cohort 3. There were no differences in pain-related HCAHPS scores across all cohorts.ConclusionsDiscontinuing PCAs and FNBs from our multimodal TKA pain management protocols and adding liposomal bupivacaine resulted in fewer narcotics consumed with no difference in pain control and faster functional recovery while maintaining high HCAHPS scores relating to pain.Level of Evidence:Level III, therapeutic study.
机译:背景技术止痛管理协议随着标准化疼痛管理方案的目前没有达成普及。多模式TKA疼痛管理方案旨在解决疼痛控制,促进功能性恢复,维持患者满意度。追踪/目的(1)对我们的疼痛管理方案进行了变化,特别是添加脂质体Bupivacaine,消除患者受控镇痛(PCA),以及停止股骨神经块(FNBS),影响TKA后的麻醉消耗吗? (2)对我们的止痛药协议进行了这些变化会影响患者报告的疼痛分数吗? (3)使用直接术后PCA是否影响快速康复和功能恢复? (4)我们的止痛药方案的变化如何影响释放处置和与医疗保健提供者和系统(HCAHPS)分数的痛苦相关的医院消费者评估?备注于2013年9月和2015年9月期间含有1808名患者的机构关节造身术数据库TKA。随着议定书的变化,将部门止痛管理协议进行比较。所有患者均接受多峰疼痛管理方案,包括术前口服药物,脊柱或全身麻醉,短暂的术中腓骨注射,以及持续术后口服突破性疼痛。从2013年9月至2014年4月,所有患者术后第一次24小时内接受术中FNB和PCA,(群组1)。从2014年5月至2014年10月,向方案中加入脂质体Bupivacaine的面膜注射,并停止FNBs(队列2)。 2015年4月后,PCA被淘汰(队列3)。对TKA疼痛管理途径没有其他重大变化。麻醉用途,8小时间隔,物理治疗里程碑和排放处置的疼痛评分。群组3(队列3:66 54吗啡毫克等当量与群组第2:82 72与队列1:96 +/- 62; p <0.001)。在队列3中手术后立即增加疼痛评分(4.0 +/- 3.5与1.2 +/- 2.2,队列的后HOC分析与3的后3:平均差异2.6,95%置信区间[ CI] 2.2-3.0; P <0.001);但是,对于住院的剩余时间并不不同。术后第1天(47% 3对2:差距2.1,95%CI 1.6-2.6; P <0.001)。更频繁地出现回家(84%[583]与78%[410's 527]与队列中的72%[421/583],p = 0.010)在群组中。与疼痛相关的HcaHPS分数没有差异来自我们多峰的TKA疼痛管理方案和添加脂质体Bupivacaine的PCAS和FNBS的所有队列导致疼痛控制较少消耗的毒素和功能恢复更快,同时保持与疼痛有关的高肝脏分数。证据:III级,治疗学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号