...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral investigations >The use of smartphones in radiographic diagnosis: accuracy on the detection of marginal gaps
【24h】

The use of smartphones in radiographic diagnosis: accuracy on the detection of marginal gaps

机译:在射线照相诊断中使用智能手机:对边缘隙检测的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ObjectiveTo compare the accuracy of computer monitor and smartphone screen for radiographic diagnosis of marginal gap.Materials and methodsForty teeth with mesial-occlusal-distal inlays (each tooth with a perfect fit and a 0.4-mm marginal gap restoration) were imaged with a phosphor plate system. Original digital radiographs were exported and analyzed with two different methods: computer monitor and smartphone screen; for the last method, images were shared with WhatsApp. Three examiners assessed all radiographs (n=160) for the presence of marginal gap by using a dichotomous scale (yes/no). Diagnostic performance of each examiner and viewing method was evaluated by means of sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and overall accuracy (Ac). Difference between the frequencies of gap detection of each method was analyzed using the McNemar test. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were calculated using kappa statistics.ResultsIntra- and inter-examiner agreements were 0.80 for both methods. Similar diagnostic performance was found for computer monitor (Se=0.87-1; Sp=0.8-0.97; Ac=0.84-0.99) and smartphone (Se=0.77-1; Sp=0.87-1; Ac=0.88-0.95) viewing methods. No statistically significant differences in the frequency of gap detection were observed between the methods (P>0.05).ConclusionDiagnostic accuracy of smartphone screens was similar to that of computer monitor for marginal gap detection.Clinical relevanceSmartphones are becoming a common daily tool. In this sense, it might be an important new aid in Dentistry, including radiographic evaluation, which could benefit patients and dentists.
机译:ObjectiveTo比较电脑监视器和智能手机屏幕的准确性,用于射线影视诊断的边际间隙。与荧光板成像含有薄膜 - 闭塞 - 远端嵌体的材料和方法的智能牙齿(每个具有完美拟合的牙齿和0.4毫米边缘间隙恢复)系统。用两种不同的方法出口和分析原始数字射线照片:计算机显示器和智能手机屏幕;对于最后一个方法,图像与WhatsApp共享。三个考官通过使用二分度(是/否)来评估所有射线照片(n = 160)的射线照片(n = 160)(是/否)。通过灵敏度(SE),特异性(SP)和总体精度(AC)评估每个检查者和观察方法的诊断性能。使用McNemar试验分析了每种方法的间隙检测频率之间的差异。使用Kappa Statistics计算审查员和审查际协议。这两种方法都有0.80的审查员和审查际协议。找到类似的诊断性能,用于计算机监视器(SE = 0.87-1; SP = 0.8-0.97; AC = 0.84-0.99)和智能手机(SE = 0.77-1; SP = 0.87-1; AC = 0.88-0.95)查看方法。在这些方法(P> 0.05)之间没有观察到间隙检测频率的统计学意义差异从这个意义上讲,它可能是牙科的重要新援助,包括射线照相评估,可以使患者和牙医受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号