首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Psychological Science >Rigidly Applied Rules? Revisiting Inflexibility in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Using Multilevel Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Rigidly Applied Rules? Revisiting Inflexibility in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Using Multilevel Meta-Analysis

机译:刚性应用规则? 使用多级Meta分析重新审视强迫症的不灵活性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several recent models of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) consider it to be a neurocognitive disorder involving inflexibility and disinhibition. Indeed, previous reviews of neuropsychological functioning in OCD suggested impaired performance in flexibility tasks. The current meta-analysis examines whether the reported differences in flexibility can be explained by general underperformance unrelated to flexibility. In addition, the role of feedback processing in inflexibility is investigated. To this end, we integrated evidence from 75 studies that compared patients with OCD with nonpsychiatric controls on at least one flexibility measure, while applying a novel approach in which task scores measuring flexibility were compared with control scores from the same tasks measuring other confounding processes. The results revealed no evidence for inflexibility in OCD, with patients’ performance most parsimoniously explained by nonspecific factors. These results challenge models stressing inflexibility as an endophenotype of OCD. Methodological implications for reviewing cognitive deficits in psychopathology are discussed.
机译:最近最近的痴迷症(OCD)模型认为是一种涉及令人反感和令人沮丧的神经认知疾病。实际上,在OCD中的神经心理功能的先前评论表明灵活性任务的性能受损。目前的Meta分析审查了报告的灵活性差异是否可以通过与灵活性无关的普遍表现来解释。此外,还研究了反馈处理的作用。为此,我们从75项研究中综合证据,这些证据将患有OCD的患者与非精神控制的患者相比至少一个灵活性测量,同时应用一种新的方法,其中将任务分数测量灵活性的尺寸与测量其他混杂过程的相同任务的控制分数进行比较。结果表明,没有证据表明在OCD中,患者的表现因非特异性因素而解释的患者的表现。这些结果挑战模型强调indlexibility作为OCD的内心型。讨论了审查精神病理学中的认知缺陷的方法论影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号