首页> 外文期刊>Clinical imaging >Comparing cancer detection rates of patients undergoing short term follow-up vs routine follow-up after benign breast biopsies, is follow-up needed?
【24h】

Comparing cancer detection rates of patients undergoing short term follow-up vs routine follow-up after benign breast biopsies, is follow-up needed?

机译:比较癌症检测率的癌症检测率在良性乳房活检后进行短期随访的VS常规后续随访,需要进行随访?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare cancer rates after benign breast biopsies between patients with short term imaging followup (STFU) and those with routine follow-up (RFU). Materials & methods: Retrospective review of benign stereotactic, US or DCE-MRI breast biopsies. Results: Of580 lesions, 192 (33%) had STFU, and 388 (67%) had RFU. For US and mammographic detected lesions," there is no difference in cancer rates between the STFU (1 cancer, n = 148) and the RFU group (0 cancer, n = 365) (p = 0.29). There were 2 cancers in the STFU group versus 0 in the RFU DCE-MRI group (p = 0.54). Conclusion: Our results support RFU after benign ultrasound and stereotactic breast biopsies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
机译:目的:将良性乳房活组织检查与短期成像后(STFU)和常规随访者(RFU)进行比较癌症率。 材料与方法:回顾性审查良性立体定向,美国或DCE-MRI乳房活组织检查。 结果:580个病变,192(33%)有STFU,388(67%)有RFU。 对于我们和乳房检测的病变,“STFU(1癌,N = 148)和RFU基团之间的癌症率没有差异(0癌,N = 365)(p = 0.29)。其中有2个癌症 RFU DCE-MRI组中的STFU集团与0(P = 0.54)。结论:我们的结果支持RFU后良性超声和立体定向乳房活检。(c)2016 Elsevier Inc保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号