...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral implants research >Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems
【24h】

Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems

机译:下颌单植入覆盖:随机控制试验的早期装载,不同植入直径和附件系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To determine surgical and prosthodontic outcomes of mandibular single-implant overdentures, opposing complete maxillary dentures, using a wide diameter implant and large ball attachment system compared with different regular diameter implants with standard attachment systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six edentulous participants (mean age 68 years, SD 9.2) were randomly assigned into three treatment groups (n= 12). A single implant was placed in the mandibular midline of participants to support an overdenture using a 6-week loading protocol. The control group received Southern regular implants and standard ball attachments. One group received Southern 8-mm-wide implants and large ball attachments. Another group received Neoss regular implants and Locator attachments. Parametric and non-parametric tests of a statistical software package (SPSS) were used to determine between groups differences in marginal bone loss, implant stability, implant, and prosthodontic success (P<0.05). Results: Implant success after 1 year was 75% for Southern regular implant (control) group; and 100% for the Southern wide and Neoss regular implant groups (P= 0.038). Mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 0.19 mm (SD 0.39) without significant differences observed. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) at baseline was significantly lower for the Southern regular (control) group than the other two groups (P=0.001; P= 0.009). At 1 year, no significant difference in implant stability was observed (mean ISQ 74.6, SD 6.1). The change in implant stability from baseline to 1 year was significant for the control group (P= 0.025). Prosthodontic success was comparable between the groups but the maintenance (41 events overall, mean 1.2) was greater for the Locator and the standard ball attachments. Conclusions: Mandibular single-implant overdentures are a successful treatment option for older edentulous adults with early loading protocol using implants of different diameters and with differ...
机译:目的:确定颌骨单植入覆盖的外科和假期结果,相反的完整上颌假牙,使用宽直径的植入物和大球连接系统,与具有标准附件系统的不同常规直径植入物相比。材料和方法:三十六个透明参与者(平均年龄68岁,SD 9.2)被随机分配到三个治疗组(n = 12)中。将单个植入物置于参与者的下颌中线,以支持使用6周的加载方案的过度封闭。对照组接到南方常规植入物和标准球附件。一组收到南部8毫米植入物和大球附件。另一个团体接受了神圣的常规植入物和定位器附件。统计软件包(SPSS)的参数和非参数测试用于确定边际骨质损失,植入稳定性,植入物和假期成功的组差异(P <0.05)。结果:南方常规植入物(控制)集团1年后植入成功为75%;南方宽和神经常规植入群(P = 0.038)100%。 1年的平均边缘骨质损失为0.19毫米(SD 0.39),没有观察到显着差异。南方常规(对照)组的基线植入稳定性商(ISQ)显着低于其他两组(P = 0.001; P = 0.009)。在1年后,观察到植入稳定性没有显着差异(平均ISQ 74.6,SD 6.1)。从基线到1年的植入物稳定性的变化对于对照组非常重要(P = 0.025)。假肢成功在组之间相当,但是定位器和标准球附件的维护(总体而言,平均值1.2)更​​大。结论:下颌单植入物覆盖是使用不同直径的植入物和不同的植入物的较旧的薄弱成年人的成功治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号