...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Laboratory Science: Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology >Laboratory Order Errors Before and After Implementation of Electronic Health Record
【24h】

Laboratory Order Errors Before and After Implementation of Electronic Health Record

机译:实验室订单在实施电子健康记录之前和之后的错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An analysis of laboratory order entry errors on randomly selected inpatient records was conducted comparing errors 12 months before and after implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) at a 571-bed community health system. Methods: A total of 720 medical records were reviewed with 10,176 orders before EHR implementation and 11,455 orders after. Errors evaluated included unsigned, duplicate, illegible, and omitted orders, results with no order, and transcription errors. Data analysis included the independent-samples t-test and Pearson Chi-square test. Results: There was a significant difference in laboratory order entry errors before and after EHR implementation (p<0.05). The percentages of unsigned orders decreased from 8.6% to 7.6%. Orders with missing results decreased from 16.5% to 11.3%, and duplicate orders decreased from 9.1% to 5.8%. Added, illegible, missing, and incorrectly transcribed orders with previous rates of 3.72%, 0.8%, 2.8%, and 0.9% were eliminated. Conclusion: Implementation of an EHR appears to improve clinical laboratory order entry.
机译:在571张床社区卫生系统的实施电子健康记录(EHR)之前和之后,对随机选择的住院记录进行了对随机选择的住院记记录的实验室订单进入误差分析。方法:在EHR实施前的10,176个订单中,共审查了720名医疗记录,并在11,455名下订单。评估的错误包括无符号,重复,难以辨别和省略的订单,无序结果和转录错误。数据分析包括独立样品T检验和Pearson Chi-Square测试。结果:EHR实施前后实验室订单进入误差有显着差异(P <0.05)。未签名订单的百分比从8.6%降至7.6%。缺失结果的订单从16.5%降至11.3%,重复订单从9.1%降至5.8%。禁止禁令,缺失,缺失和错误转账,以前的率为3.72%,0.8%,2.8%和0.9%被淘汰。结论:ehr的实施似乎改善了临床实验室命令入口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号