...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >The importance of individual biology in the clinical use of serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer
【24h】

The importance of individual biology in the clinical use of serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer

机译:个体生物学在血清癌症患者临床使用中的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: An increased focus on the biological behaviour of serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer, i.e., carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), has been advocated to improve their clinical use. Due to the paucity and poor design of available studies evaluating biological variation (BV) of CA-125 and the lack of BV data for HE4, in this study we evaluated BV of both biomarkers.Methods: Monthly we obtained serum samples from 14 pre- (PreM) and 14 post-menopausal (PostM) healthy women for 4 consecutive months. Once all samples were available, they were analysed in a single run in duplicate for CA-125 and HE4 on Roche Modular system. Data were analysed by ANOVA.Results: For both biomarkers no difference in median concentrations was found between PreM and PostM. For CA-125 the intra-individual CV (CVI) was not different between groups (9.1% in both). For HE4 CVI was higher in PreM (12.1%) than in PostM (6.5%) (p0.001). Between-subject CVs were 10.6% for CA-125 and 16.4% for HE4, with no influence by the fertility status. Both biomarkers showed high individuality meaning that the use of population-based reference limits may have limited value for their interpretation. Reference change values were 26% for CA-125 (all), 34% for HE4 PreM and 18% for HE4 PostM.Conclusions: Monitoring longitudinal changes in serum concentrations of ovarian cancer biomarkers over time is probably better than using single threshold rules. According to differences in BV due to the hormonal status, one should differently interpret HE4 changes in PreM and PostM.
机译:背景:提高了对卵巢癌的血清生物标志物的生物学行为的重点,即碳水化合物抗原125(CA-125)和人对象蛋白4(HE4),已被提倡改善其临床使用。由于缺乏的可用研究设计,评估CA-125的生物变异(BV)和HE4的BV数据缺乏BV数据,我们评估了BIOM标志物的BV。方法:每月我们获得14个预期的血清样本(PROM)和14个后绝经后(邮水)健康妇女连续4个月。一旦所有样品都有,就在单一的运行中分析了在Roche模块化系统上的CA-125和HE4的一式两份。通过Anova分析数据对于Ca-125,组间CV(CVI)在基团之间并不不同(两者均为9.1%)。对于HE4,CVI在PREM(12.1%)高于蛋白质(6.5%)(P <0.001)。对于HE4的CA-125和16.4%的受试者CVS为10.6%,不受生育状态的影响。两种生物标志物都表现出高性性,这意味着使用基于人口的参考限制可能对其解释有限。 CA-125(全部)的参考变更值为26%,HE4 PREM的34%,18%的HE4 POSTM.CONCLUSIONS随着时间的推移监测卵巢癌生物标志物的血清浓度的纵向变化可能比使用单门规则更好。根据BV因荷尔蒙地位而差异,应该不同地解释预订在Prem和Postm中的HE4变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号