...
首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >Does market-oriented reform increase energy rebound effect? Evidence from China's regional development
【24h】

Does market-oriented reform increase energy rebound effect? Evidence from China's regional development

机译:以市场为导向的改革是否增加了能量反弹效果? 来自中国区域发展的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The actual energy savings from efficiency improvement may be less than expectations because of behavior response of micro-units, which is named as rebound effect. For producers, the magnitude of such response depends on the operating flexibility. However, the precise; role of operating flexibility in rebound effect is still unknown because of difficulties in measuring operating flexibility. Over the past four decades, the Chinese government has implemented a wide range of reforms aiming at market-oriented transition, which increase operating flexibility of micro-units. It is natural to be questioned whether China's market-oriented reform increases energy rebound effect. In this study, we aim to explore the impacts of marketization on rebound effect. Using partially linear functional-coefficient panel data model to avoid prior criteria in model specification and smooth the change of rebound effect across regions, we found that about 20% of originally expected energy conservation from energy efficiency improvement would be rebounded in 2013. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that in line with China's uneven reform across regions, coastal provinces such as Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Tianjin, Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangdong, have larger rebound effects, which may be connected with their larger operating flexibility. The findings can enhance our understanding on the mechanisms of rebound effect as behavior responses. We also anticipate our paper to provide knowledge and broader implications toward optimal policy designs alongside China's ongoing market-oriented reforms.
机译:由于微单元的行为响应,效率改善的实际节能可能少于期望,这被称为反弹效果。对于生产者来说,这种反应的幅度取决于操作灵活性。但是,精确;由于测量操作灵活性困难,运行灵活性在反弹效果中的作用仍然未知。在过去的四十年中,中国政府实施了各种旨在以市场为导向的转型的改革,这增加了微型单位的经营灵活性。对于中国的市场导向的改革是如何增加能量反弹效应是很自然的。在这项研究中,我们的目标是探讨市场化对反弹效应的影响。利用部分线性功能系数面板数据模型以避免模型规范的先前标准,并在地区的反弹效果的变化平滑,我们发现大约20%的最初预期的能源效率改善的节能将在2013年反弹。此外,结果表明,根据中国在地区的不均匀改革,江苏,浙江,天津,上海,北京和广东等沿海省份都有更大的反弹效果,这可能与其更大的经营灵活性相连。调查结果可以提高我们对对行为应对反弹效应机制的理解。我们还预计我们的论文向中国正在进行的以市场为导向的改革提供知识和更广泛的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号