首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >Energy efficiency gap and target setting: A study of information asymmetry between governments and industries in China
【24h】

Energy efficiency gap and target setting: A study of information asymmetry between governments and industries in China

机译:能效差距和目标环境:中国政府与产业信息不对称研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Information asymmetry between governments and industries is a major impediment to set an optimal energy efficiency target for reduction in energy demand. Typically, the regulators face challenges of incomplete and imperfect information on the minimum improvement in energy intensity that industries would achieve in baseline cases and the maximum technical potential of energy efficiency that industries are able to achieve. By applying a two-tier stochastic frontier model based on provincial panel data 2006-2015 in China, we disentangle the impacts of information asymmetry between the governments and firms on industrial energy intensity from other major regulatory, technological and economic factors. Results show that, on average, nearly 75% of the unexplained variation in industrial energy intensity is attributed to the information gap between firms and governments. On average, the realized energy intensity is upper biased by 7.25% due to the information gap compared to the expected level without the information gap although the net impacts vary considerably across provinces and over time. One observation is that firms have much stronger impact on the energy intensity in the period when the government prioritized economic growth rather than energy savings. In addition, the impact of firms and governments varies markedly across the quartiles of economic development level, technological progress, policy stringency, and energy resource endowment.
机译:政府和行业之间的信息不对称是一个主要的障碍,可以为减少能源需求进行最佳能效目标。通常,监管机构面临不完全和不完美信息的挑战,了解产业将在基线案例中实现的能源强度的最低改善以及行业能够实现的能源效率的最大技术潜力。通过在中国的2006 - 2015年基于省级面板数据的两层随机边疆模型,我们解除了各国政府与企业与其他重大监管,技术和经济因素的工业能源强度的影响的影响。结果表明,平均而言,工业能源强度近75%的工业能源强度变异归因于公司与政府之间的信息差距。平均而言,由于信息差距与无信息间隙相比,实现的能量强度是由于信息差距相比的偏差为7.25%,尽管净兴奋剂遍布省份和随着时间的推移,但净的影响差异很大。一个观察是,当时政府优先考虑经济增长而不是节能时,公司对能源强度的影响更强。此外,企业和政府的影响在经济发展水平,技术进步,政策严格和能源资源禀赋中的四分位数明显不同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《China Economic Review》 |2019年第2019期|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Natl Univ Singapore Singapore Singapore;

    Taiyuan Univ Technol Taiyuan Shanxi Peoples R China;

    CICERO Ctr Int Climate Res Norway Oslo Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 中国经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号