首页> 外文期刊>Chemistry in Australia >Ingenious vs obvious: is your invention patentable?
【24h】

Ingenious vs obvious: is your invention patentable?

机译:巧妙VS明显:您的发明是专利性吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dr Andrew Gregory, Registered Patent Attorney, FB Rice In many industries inventions provide solutions to known problems. Although an invention may be useful, an inventor has to prove that their invention justifies the granting of a patent. Patent law dictates that to qualify for patent protection, all inventions must be novel and possess an inventive step. Establishing novelty is generally a factual exercise - is the invention new as compared with known information (prior art)? However, establishing that an inventive step exists and an invention is not obvious, is somewhat subjective in nature and often difficult to prove once the invention is disclosed due to hindsight.
机译:Andrew Gregory博士,注册专利律师,FB米饭在许多行业发明中提供了已知问题的解决方案。 尽管本发明可能是有用的,但发明人必须证明他们的发明证明了对专利的授予。 专利法决定,符合专利保护的资格,所有发明必须是新颖的并且具有创造性的步骤。 建立新颖性通常是一种事实练习 - 与已知信息(现有技术)相比,本发明是新的一种新的方法吗? 然而,建立一种本发明的步骤并且发明不明显,其自然界是有些主观的,并且一旦通过后岛公开了本发明,就经常难以证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号