...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering Research & Design: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers >Performance analyses of LP and MILP solvers based on newly introduced scale: Case studies of water network problems in chemical processes
【24h】

Performance analyses of LP and MILP solvers based on newly introduced scale: Case studies of water network problems in chemical processes

机译:基于新引入规模的LP和MILP求解器的性能分析:化学过程中水网络问题的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To meet fresh water requirement as well as to tackle wastewater generation are serious issues in process industries in the present scenario. To deal with water network problems, various models and computer aided tools have been used. GAMS software is used for this purpose since many years. All kind of water network models including LP, NLP, MILP and MINLP are extensively solved by this tool. However, it appears that no specific work is available in literature to observe the behaviour of different solvers on industrial case studies. The present study addresses this gap through behaviour analysis of LP and MILP solvers. Four case studies are considered from open literature, which include water networks for single contaminant, multi-contaminant and process as well as treatment units. LP models of all cases are solved through three different solvers i.e. CPLEX, CONOPT and MINOS. Further, piping cost is incorporated into LP models and thus, converted these to MILP, which are solved using three solvers such as BDMLP, CBC and SCIP. Results obtained through six solvers are compared at BECOTA scale. MINOS performs better for LP models as compared to CPLEX- a traditionally used LP solver. However, CBC is better amongst other MILP solvers considered. It is observed that selection of a particular solver may significantly influence the water network design as well as plant economy. Hence, selection of solvers should be carried out carefully. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:为了满足淡水要求以及解决废水的发电是本地情景的过程行业中的严重问题。要处理水网络问题,已经使用了各种型号和计算机辅助工具。 GAMS软件以来自多年以来用于此目的。此工具广泛解决了包括LP,NLP,MILP和MINLP的各种水网络模型。然而,似乎没有具体的工作是在文献中提供的,以观察不同求解器对工业案例研究的行为。本研究通过LP和MILP求解器的行为分析解决了这种差距。开放文献中考虑了四种案例研究,包括用于单污染物,多污染物和过程以及治疗单元的水网络。所有案例的LP模型通过三种不同的求解器来解决.. CPLEX,CONOPT和MINOS。此外,将管道成本掺入LP模型中,从而将这些转化为MILP,其使用三种溶剂如BDMLP,CBC和SPIP进行求解。通过六个溶剂获得的结果在Becota Scale中进行比较。与CPLEX-A传统使用的LP求解器相比,MINOS对LP型号进行更好。然而,CBC在其他阵线溶剂中更好。观察到,特定求解器的选择可以显着影响水网络设计以及植物经济性。因此,应仔细选择溶剂。 (c)2018化学工程师机构。 elsevier b.v出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号