首页> 外文期刊>CASTANEA >Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:不同成像技术的性能,用于检测妇科恶性肿瘤的对淋巴结淋巴结转移的分析:系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Object: The purpose of this review is to assess the diagnostic performance of different imaging techniques for the detection of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis from gynecological malignancies. Methods: Six databases, from the earliest available date of indexing through July 22, 2018, were systematically searched. In addition, the reference lists of relevant articles were searched by hand. Study allocation, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently performed by 2 reviewers. The size effect, sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic OR, and 95% CIs were used in the meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) and Q* were calculated to reflect the synthesized diagnostic accuracy. Statistical calculations of this meta-analysis were conducted using STATA version 14.0 software. Results: Across 41 eligible studies (1,615 participants), pooled SEN, SPE, and AUC of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), PET-CT, and lymphangiography analyses were 25%, 93%, 0.7675; 60%, 94%, 0.9050; 83%, 96%, 0.9422; 66%, 97%, 0.9501; 77%, 75%, 0.8332, respectively. Analysis of combined summary receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that PET and PET-CT were superior to other imaging modalities. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that PET and PET-CT should be the first choice for detecting PALN metastasis in gynecological malignancies. CT was also suitable for confirmation. MRI was not recommended. Further studies are needed for PALN assessment.
机译:对象:本综述的目的是评估不同成像技术的诊断性能,用于检测来自妇科恶性肿瘤的Para-主动脉淋巴结(Paln)转移。方法:六个数据库,从2018年7月22日至2018年7月22日开始的最早可用日期,系统地搜索。此外,手工搜查了相关文章的参考列表。学习分配,数据提取和质量评估由2名审稿人独立执行。在META分析中使用尺寸效应,灵敏度(SEN),特异性(SPE),阳性似然比,负似然比,诊断或95%CI。计算曲线(AUC)和Q *下的区域以反映合成的诊断准确性。使用STATA版本14.0软件进行该元分析的统计计算。结果:跨41名符合条件的研究(1,615名参与者),集合的SEN,SPE和磁共振成像(MRI),计算机断层扫描(CT),正电子发射断层扫描(PET),PET-CT和淋巴图分析为25%, 93%,0.7675; 60%,94%,0.9050; 83%,96%,0.9422; 66%,97%,0.9501; 77%,75%,0.8332分别。组合摘要接收器的分析操作特性曲线表明,PET和PET-CT优于其他成像方式。结论:目前的荟萃分析表明,宠物和PET-CT应该是检测妇科恶性肿瘤中Paln转移的首选。 CT也适合确认。不推荐MRI。 Paln评估需要进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号