...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica >Repeatability in and interchangeability between the macular and the fast macular thickness map protocols: a study on normal eyes with Stratus optical coherence tomography
【24h】

Repeatability in and interchangeability between the macular and the fast macular thickness map protocols: a study on normal eyes with Stratus optical coherence tomography

机译:黄斑和快速黄斑厚度图方案的可重复性和互换性:使用Stratus光学相干断层扫描技术对正常眼睛的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To collect a normal material and to compare the macular and the fast macular thickness map protocols regarding normal values and repeatability.Methods: Sixty-seven individuals underwent three repeated scans with the macular thickness protocol; 45 of them also had three scans with the fast thickness protocol in Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT). The maps were divided into nine ETDRS fields, where thickness values were presented. The repeatability was calculated as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variance (CV) and coefficient of repeatability (CR). For comparison between the two protocols, limits of agreement were determined according to Bland-Altman.Results: Normal values for the two protocols were very close. Repeatability was high. ICC for all areas was 0.92-0.98. CV was less than 1% and CR was 6-8mum for both protocols, with the exception of the fovea in the fast protocol (where CV was 1.44% and CR 12.4 /an). Limits of agreement between the two protocols were less than 10 mun as a rule.Conclusion: Normal values for the protocols are equal and they both have excellent repeatability. The fast macular map is a good alternative with the possible exception of the fovea, where variation is twice that of the macular thickness map.
机译:目的:收集正常材料,并比较黄斑厚度图和快速黄斑厚度图方案在正常值和可重复性方面的方法。方法:67名个体接受了黄斑厚度方案的3次重复扫描。他们中的45人还使用Stratus光学相干断层扫描(OCT)中的快速厚度协议进行了3次扫描。这些图被分为九个ETDRS字段,其中显示了厚度值。计算重复性为组内相关系数(ICC),方差系数(CV)和重复性系数(CR)。为了比较这两个协议,根据Bland-Altman确定了协议的限制。结果:这两个协议的正常值非常接近。重复性很高。所有区域的ICC为0.92-0.98。两种方案的CV均小于1%,CR为6-8mum,但快速方案中的中央凹除外(其中CV为1.44%,CR 12.4 / an)。这两个协议之间的协议限制通常小于10 mun。结论:协议的正常值是相等的,并且它们都具有出色的可重复性。快速黄斑图是一个不错的选择,但中央凹可能例外,后者的变化是黄斑厚度图的两倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号