...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology: A Journal of Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment >Future Liver Remnant Indocyanine Green Plasma Clearance Rate as a Predictor of Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure After Portal Vein Embolization
【24h】

Future Liver Remnant Indocyanine Green Plasma Clearance Rate as a Predictor of Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure After Portal Vein Embolization

机译:未来肝脏残留吲哚菁绿色等离子体清除率作为门静脉栓塞后肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的预测因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To evaluate the utility of future liver remnant plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green (ICGK-F) for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) compared with percentage future liver remnant volume-to-total liver volume ratio (%FLR) after portal vein embolization (PVE). Materials and Methods PVE procedures in 20 patients (15 patients underwent PVE with absolute ethanol; 5 patients with gelatin particles) from 2010 to 2017 were analyzed. %FLR?=?future liver remnant volume (ml)/[total liver volume (ml)???tumor volume (ml)]?×?100; ICGK- F ?=?plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green (ICGK)?×?%FLR/100 were calculated before and after PVE. PHLF was categorized according to the criteria of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. For predicting PHLF, we compared the ICGK-F and %FLR after PVE between the grade A PHLF group and the non-grade A PHLF (grades B and C) group. Results All PVE procedures were successful. While the ICGK-F of the grade A PHLF group (median 0.073, n ?=?16) was about twice that of the non-grade A PHLF group (median 0.043, n ?=?4), showing a significant difference (Mann–Whitney U test:? P ?=?0.002), there was no significant difference in %FLR between the grade A PHLF group and the non-grade A PHLF group (Mann–Whitney U test: P ?=?0.335). Conclusion ICGK-F was significantly higher in the grade A PHLF group than in the non-grade A PHLF group (grades B and C), and ICGK-F was more useful for predicting PHLF than %FLR.
机译:目的,评价吲哚菁绿(ICGK-F)的未来肝脏残留血浆间隙率的效用,以预测肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)与门户后未来肝脏残留体积 - 总肝体积比(%FLR)相比静脉栓塞(PVE)。分析了20例患者中的材料和方法PVE程序(15名患者接受过绝对乙醇的患者; 5例乙醇颗粒患者)从2010年到2017年从2010年到2017年。 %flr?=?未来肝脏残余体积(ml)/ [总肝脏体积(ml)吗???肿瘤体积(ml)]?×100; ICGK-F?=?吲哚菁绿(ICGK)的血浆间隙率(ICGK)?×α××α%FLR / 100在PVE之前和之后计算。 PHLF根据肝脏手术国际研究组的标准进行分类。为了预测PHLF,我们将ICGK-F和%FLR与PHLF组和非等级PHLF(等级B和C)组进行比较。结果所有PVE程序都是成功的。虽然级别的PHLF组的ICGK-F(中值0.073,N?=β16)约为非级别PHLF组的两倍(中位数0.043,N?=?4),显示出显着差异(曼-Whitney U Test :? p?= 0.002),级PHLF组和非级PHLF组之间的%FLR没有显着差异(Mann-Whitney U测试:P?= 0.335)。结论ICGK-F在级PHLF组中显着高于非级别的PHLF组(等级B和C),并且ICGK-F更有用的是预测PHLF而不是%FLR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号