首页> 外文期刊>Cytometry: The Journal of the Society for Analytical Cytology >DNA IMAGE CYTOMETRY ON SECTIONS AS COMPARED WITH IMAGE CYTOMETRY ON SMEARS AND FLOW CYTOMETRY IN MELANOMA
【24h】

DNA IMAGE CYTOMETRY ON SECTIONS AS COMPARED WITH IMAGE CYTOMETRY ON SMEARS AND FLOW CYTOMETRY IN MELANOMA

机译:与黑色素瘤的涂片和流式细胞术图像细胞计数法相比,部分DNA图像细胞计数法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

DNA measurements of 130 melanomas were carried out by flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM). ICM was applied to cytological preparations of fresh material (cICM) and to sections of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (sICM). The DNA ploidy, the DNA index of G0/G1 peaks (DI), and the proliferation index (PI) were used to compare all the methods. The following parameters reflecting malignancy were calculated only from ICM histograms: the 5c exceeding rate (5cER) and the malignancy grade (MG). In cases found to be DNA aneuploid by FCM, the PI values (FCM versus cICM) and the DIs (between all methods) showed a high correlation, and the concordance in relation to the DNA ploidy status was 96% (FCM versus cICM) and 94% (FCM versus sICM). However, we ascertained essential differences between FCM and ICM in melanomas classified as DNA diploid by FCM. The concordance in DNA ploidy was only 66% (FCM versus cICM) and 64% (FCM versus sICM). In contrast, cICM and sICM yielded similar results in most cases. With the exception of the near diploid range, ICM is superior to FCM in detecting DNA aneuploidy. In particular, DNA tetraploid stem Lines can easily be overlooked by FCM. Therefore, DNA measurements of tumours judged to be DNA diploid by FCM must be verified by ICM. ICM on sections proved to be applicable and yielded reliable results provided that a suitable thickness was used, and the measuring of sectioned and overlapping nuclei was largely avoided by careful focusing in either direction. (C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [References: 41]
机译:通过流式细胞仪(FCM)和图像细胞仪(ICM)对130个黑色素瘤进行DNA测量。 ICM用于新鲜材料的细胞学制剂(cICM)和福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织(sICM)的切片。使用DNA倍性,G0 / G1峰的DNA指数(DI)和增殖指数(PI)来比较所有方法。仅从ICM直方图计算出以下反映恶性程度的参数:5c超出率(5cER)和恶性等级(MG)。如果通过FCM发现DNA为非整倍体,则PI值(FCM与cICM)和DI(在所有方法之间)显示出高度相关性,并且与DNA倍体状态相关的一致性为96%(FCM与cICM),并且94%(FCM与sICM)。但是,我们确定了FCM分类为DNA二倍体的黑色素瘤中FCM和ICM之间的本质区别。 DNA倍性的一致性仅为66%(FCM与cICM)和64%(FCM与sICM)。相反,在大多数情况下,cICM和sICM产生相似的结果。除了接近二倍体范围外,ICM在检测DNA非整倍性方面优于FCM。特别是,DNA四倍体茎系很容易被FCM忽略。因此,必须通过ICM验证通过FCM判断为DNA二倍体的肿瘤的DNA测量。如果使用适当的厚度,则切片上的ICM被证明是适用的,并且产生了可靠的结果,并且通过在任一方向上仔细聚焦,可以很大程度上避免测量切片和重叠的核。 (C)1996 Wiley-Liss,Inc. [参考:41]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号