【24h】

Limits of technique: Ethical issues

机译:技术限制:道德问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Radiation oncology departments are paradigmatic examples of the general evolution of medicine towards an ever more important presence of technology. The distance to the body or our radical dependence on the machine are concrete factors conditioning care practices in radiotherapy. Thus, an essential question appears: can technique be seen as a real limit for our primary function of care in radiation oncology? It is also necessary to consider the postures this question could lead to: the real risk of finding legitimacy in our sole function of technicians. If technique can be seen as a possible hindrance to our care role, it also appears that technique can create unexpected spaces, where radiation oncologists can express their own definition of care with patients. It is time for our community to take into account this specific aspect of the technologic issue in order to attest the reality of its limits and possibilities. A collective reflection on the ethics of technique, and more broadly on the ethics of care practices in radiation oncology appears relevant. (C) 2019 Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
机译:辐射肿瘤学部门是医学一般演变对往往的技术的重要存在的范式示例。对身体的距离或我们对机器的激进依赖性是放射疗法中的具体因素调理实践。因此,出现一个基本问题:可以将技术视为我们在辐射肿瘤学中主要照顾的主要功能的真正限制?还有必要考虑这个问题可能导致的姿势:在技术人员唯一的功能中找到合法性的真正风险。如果技术可以被视为可能的关注作用的可能障碍,那么技术也可以创造出意外的空间,辐射脑神经医学家可以表达自己对患者的护理定义。现在是我们社区考虑到技术问题的特定方面的时候了,以证明其限制和可能性的现实。关于技术伦理的集体反思,更广泛地对放射肿瘤学中的护理措施伦理学相关。 (c)2019 Societe Francaise de Radiotherapie Oncologique(SFRO)。由Elsevier Masson SA出版。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号