Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al et al .

Sridharan Kannan; Sequeira Reginald P.

首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al et al .

【24h】

Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al et al .

机译：评论“基因型引导瓦法林给药与常规给药策略：TSE等人的系统评价和荟萃分析”TSE等。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology》 |2018年第9期|共3页
作者
Sridharan Kannan; Sequeira Reginald P.;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics College of Medicine and Medical SciencesArabian Gulf;

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics College of Medicine and Medical SciencesArabian Gulf;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类药理学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al et al . [J] . Sridharan Kannan, Sequeira Reginald P. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology . 2018,第9期

机译：评论“基因型引导瓦法林给药与常规给药策略：TSE等人的系统评价和荟萃分析”TSE等。
2. Reply to ‘Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al et al .’ [J] . Tse Gary, Roever Leonardo, Wong Martin C. S., British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology . 2018,第9期

机译：回复“关于”基因型引导的华法林给药与对阵常规给药策略的“评论”：TSE等人的随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
3. Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials [J] . Gary Tse, Mengqi Gong, Guangping Li, British journal of clinical pharmacology . 2018,第9期

机译：基因型指导的华法林剂量与常规剂量策略：随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
4. High Dose Vitamin E Supplementation and Mortality: Discussion of the Results of a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [C] . International Society for Free Radical Research . 2006

机译：高剂量维生素E补充和死亡率：讨论随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析结果
5. A comparative study of quality of life in patients with low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated at a single institution: Stereotactic radiotherapy vs. high dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy vs. high dose-rate brachytherapy boost [D] . Helou, Joelle. 2017

机译：单一机构治疗的中低危前列腺癌患者生活质量的比较研究：立体定向放疗与高剂量率近距离放射疗法单药疗法与高剂量率近距离放射疗法增强
6. Reply to ‘Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al.’ [O] . Gary Tse, Leonardo Roever, Martin C. S. Wong, 2018

机译：答复谢（Tse）等人对基因型指导的华法林剂量与常规剂量策略的评论：对随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析的评论。
7. Reply to ‘Comment on ‘Genotype-guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al .’ [O] . Gary Tse, Leonardo Roever, Martin C. S. Wong, 2018

机译：回复“评论”基因型引导的华法林给药与常规给药策略：TSE等人的随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comment on ‘Genotype‐guided warfarin dosing vs. vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials’ by Tse et al et al .

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅