...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Quality of life of immigrant and non‐immigrant infertile patients in a publicly funded in?vitro fertilisation program: a cross‐sectional study
【24h】

Quality of life of immigrant and non‐immigrant infertile patients in a publicly funded in?vitro fertilisation program: a cross‐sectional study

机译:移民和非移民不孕症患者的生活质量在一个公共资助的?体外施肥计划:横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To investigate whether there are differences in fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) and socio‐demographic characteristics between immigrants and non‐immigrant patients attending a government‐funded fertility program. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting McGill University Reproductive Center in Montreal, Canada, at a time when governmental funding for in?vitro fertilisation ( IVF ) was provided to all residents. Population All infertile patients, males and females, attending the center between March and July 2015. Methods Patients were invited to complete anonymous questionnaires which included socio‐demographic items and the validated FertiQoL questionnaire. Main outcome measures Socio‐demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital state, infertility type & duration, previous IVF attempts; education, employment, income, ethnicity, spoken languages) and FertiQoL scores. Results In all, 1020 patients completed the questionnaires; of these, 752 (77.7%) non‐immigrant Canadian citizens and 215 (22.3%) resident immigrants were included in the analysis. Median duration in Canada for immigrants was 4?years. Immigrants were more likely to have university/graduate degrees (75% versus 64%), to be unemployed (37% versus 13.1%) and to have lower annual household incomes (72.8% versus 39.5%, all P? ?0.05). They also reported poorer QoL and achieved significantly lower scores in the emotional, mind/body, social, treatment and total FertiQoL domains. Multivariate analysis showed male gender, lower education level and Caucasian/European ethnicity to be significantly associated with higher QoL. Conclusions Despite governmental funding of IVF , immigrants experience reduced fertility QoL, implying cost is not the only barrier to IVF use. The reduced QoL may stem from cross‐cultural differences in infertility perception. This population may be at greater risk for depression and anxiety and should be flagged accordingly. Tweetable abstract Immigrants’ fertility QoL is lower despite publicly funded IVF implying cost is not the only barrier to IVF use.
机译:目的探讨移民生育质量(FERTIQOL)和移民与非移民患者的生育质量和社会人口特征是否存在差异。设计横断面研究。在所有居民提供政府施肥(IVF)的政府资金时,在加拿大蒙特利尔设定麦吉尔大学生殖中心。人口所有不孕症患者,男性和女性,在2015年3月和7月之间参加中心。方法被邀请患者完成匿名问卷,其中包括社会人口统计项目和经过验证的培养的培养培养型问卷调查问卷。主要结果衡量社会人口统计特征(年龄,性别,婚姻状况,不孕症类型&持续时间,以前的IVF尝试;教育,就业,收入,种族,口语语言)和FERTIQOL分数。结果所有,1020名患者完成问卷;其中,752名(77.7%)非移民加拿大公民和215名(22.3%)居民移民被纳入分析。加拿大移民的中位数持续时间为4?年。移民更有可能拥有大学/毕业学位(75%与64%),失业(37%对13.1%),每年的家庭收入较低(72.8%,所有P?&& 0.05) 。他们还报告了较差的QOL,在情感,思想/身体,社会,治疗和培养型域中的总数明显降低得分。多变量分析表明,男性性别,降低教育水平和白种人/欧洲种族与较高QOL有关​​。结论尽管IVF政府资助,移民经历了降低生育QOL,暗示成本不是IVF使用的唯一障碍。降低的QOL可以源于不孕症感知的跨文化差异。这种人口可能更大的抑郁和焦虑风险,并应相应地标记。尽管公开资助的IVF暗示成本,但Twelable Abstract移民QOL较低的速度较低,这不是IVF使用的唯一障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号