首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Parents’ experiences of care following the loss of a baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: a UK qualitative study
【24h】

Parents’ experiences of care following the loss of a baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: a UK qualitative study

机译:在流产,死产和新生儿死亡之间的边缘失去婴儿失去后,父母的护理经历:英国的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To explore the healthcare experiences of parents whose baby died either before, during or shortly after birth between 20 +0 and 23 +6 ?weeks of gestation in order to identify practical ways to improve healthcare provision. Design Qualitative interview study. Setting England through two parent support organisations and four NHS Trusts. Sample A purposive sample of parents. Methods Thematic analysis of semi‐structured in‐depth narrative interviews. Main outcome measures Parents’ healthcare experiences. Results The key overarching theme to emerge from interviews with 38 parents was the importance of the terminology used to refer to the death of their baby. Parents who were told they were ‘losing a baby’ rather than ‘having a miscarriage’ were more prepared for the realities of labour, the birth experience and for making decisions around seeing and holding their baby. Appropriate terminology validated their loss, and impacted on parents’ health and wellbeing immediately following bereavement and in the longer term. Conclusion For parents experiencing the death of their baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death, ensuring the use of appropriate terminology that reflects parents’ preferences is vital. This helps to validate their loss and prepare them for the experiences of labour and birth. Reflecting parents’ language preferences combined with compassionate bereavement care is likely to have a positive impact on parents’ experiences and improve longer‐term outcomes. Tweetable abstract Describing baby loss shortly before 24?weeks of gestation as a ‘miscarriage’ does not prepare parents for labour and birth, seeing their baby and making memories.
机译:目的探讨父母的医疗保健经验,其婴儿在出生之前或短暂的20 + 0和23 +6?周期的妊娠期以后,以确定改善医疗保健规定的实际方法。设计定性面试学习。通过两个父支持组织和四个NHS信任设置英格兰。样本父母的目的样本。方法对半结构化深入叙事访谈的主题分析。主要结果衡量父母的医疗保健经验。结果38家父母从访谈中出现的主要总统主题是术语用于指婴儿死亡的术语的重要性。被告知他们“失去一个婴儿”而不是“流产”的父母更准备为劳动的现实,出生经历以及在看到和抱着宝宝周围做出决定。适当的术语验证了他们的损失,并影响了父母的健康和幸福,在丧亲之后和长期持续。结论父母在流产,死产和新生儿死亡之间的婴儿死亡,确保使用反映父母的偏好的适当术语至关重要。这有助于验证他们的损失,并为劳动和出生的经验做好准备。反映父母的语言偏好结合富有同情心的丧亲护理,可能对父母的经验产生积极影响,并提高长期成果。 Twelable Abstract描述了24岁以前的婴儿损失,因为“流产”不准备父母的劳动和出生,看到他们的婴儿和回忆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号