首页> 外文期刊>Biosystems Engineering >Calibrating Spanner psychrometers for the effects of ambient temperature: theoretical and experimental considerations
【24h】

Calibrating Spanner psychrometers for the effects of ambient temperature: theoretical and experimental considerations

机译:校准扳手的心理仪,用于环境温度的影响:理论和实验考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Calibration models are indispensable for the use of Spanner-type psychrometers, but the existing calibration models have not been adequately evaluated. A non-zero intercept in the regression between electrical output (E) and water potential (Psi) is commonly observed during Spanner psychrometer calibration, but is incompatible with the temperature correction factor (TCF) model, used to describe the temperature-dependence of the E/Psi relation. Calibration errors for 10 commercial, in-situ, temperature-compensated psychrometers, were compared over a temperature and Psi range of 10-40 degrees Cand -2.5 to 0 MPa, respectively, using the current commercial TCF model, five modified TCF models, two empirical models, and a mechanistic model. TCF models differed in whether the E/Psi relation was only determined at 25 degrees C and extrapolated to other temperatures, or whether the relation was established across temperatures, and whether model parameters were determined for each psychrometer (individual-fit) or all psychrometers (group-fit). Measurement error (deviation from linearity in the EPP relation at each temperature), was 0.042 MPa, and only one individual-fit modified E/Psi model exhibited an error (0.048 MPa) which was not statistically different from measurement error. Individual-fit errors for other models ranged from 0.058 to 0.100 MPa. Group-fit errors for the Rawlins and all of the TCF models covered a relatively narrow range (0.067-0.070 MPa) compared to group-fit errors for all the empirical models (0.820-0.109 MPa). (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IAgrE.
机译:校准模型对于使用扳手型心理仪是必不可少的,但现有的校准模型尚未得到充分评估。在扳手的扫描仪校准期间通常观察到电输出(E)和水电位(PSI)之间的回归中的非零截距,但与用于描述温度依赖性的温度校正因子(TCF)模型不相容E / PSI关系。 10商业,原位,温度补偿的心理计数器的校准误差分别在10-40度-2.5至0MPa的温度和PSI范围内比较,使用当前的商业TCF模型,五种改进的TCF模型,两个经验模型和机械模型。 TCF模型是否仅在25℃下确定E / PSI关系并外推到其他温度,或者是否在温度下建立了关系,以及针对每个幻影计(个体拟合)或所有的心理计组合)。测量误差(在每个温度下EPP关系中的线性度偏差)为0.042MPa,并且只有一个单独的修改E / PSI模型呈现出与测量误差没有统计不同的误差(0.048MPa)。其他型号的个性化错误范围为0.058至0.100 MPa。与所有经验模型的组合误差相比,罗林斯的组合误差和所有TCF模型覆盖了相对窄的范围(0.067-0.070MPa)(0.820-0.109 MPa)。 (c)2019年由elsevier有限公司代表IAGRE发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号