...
首页> 外文期刊>BioScience >Reconciling Conflicting Paradigms of Biodiversity Conservation: Human Intervention and Rewilding
【24h】

Reconciling Conflicting Paradigms of Biodiversity Conservation: Human Intervention and Rewilding

机译:协调生物多样性保护的冲突范式:人类干预和重新选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are strong opposing views among conservationists about whether we have to intervene to safeguard our natural heritage or not. In the Western European tradition, human intervention has been dominating, whereas, elsewhere, rewilding aimed at restoring self-regulating ecosystems has often been preferred. However, cultural rather than ecological differences are at the root of these opposing paradigms, leading to management strategies that are not always optimal for biodiversity conservation. In the present article, we propose a framework based on the relationship between ecosystem dynamics and the human footprint, including land-use legacies, to guide the mixture of rewilding and intervention practices in order to ensure a biodiverse future. We argue that these paradigms are not conflicting but complementary and advocate for rewilding where possible, human intervention where needed.
机译:关于我们是否必须干预以保护我们的自然遗产,存在强烈的反对意见。 在西欧传统中,人类干预一直在主导,而其他地方,旨在恢复自我监管生态系统的重新选择往往是优先的。 然而,文化而不是生态差异是这些反对范式的根源,导致管理策略并不总是对生物多样性保护的最佳选择。 在本文中,我们提出了一种基于生态系统动态和人类足迹之间的关系的框架,包括土地使用遗产,引导复合和干预实践的混合,以确保生物多样化的未来。 我们认为,这些范式并不相互矛盾,而且在可能的情况下,在可能的情况下,可以在可能的情况下进行补充和倡导,以便在需要的地方进行人力干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号