首页> 外文期刊>Bioethics >Our flawed approach to undue inducement in medical research
【24h】

Our flawed approach to undue inducement in medical research

机译:我们在医学研究中过度诱导的缺陷方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Some worry that offering too much money to participate in medical research can seduce people into participating against their better judgment. These overly attractive offers that impair judgment are often referred to as 'undue inducements'. The current approach to prevent undue inducement is to limit the size of such offers. The hope is that smaller offers will not be attractive enough to impair judgment. Even if this is true, I argue that we should reject this solution. In Section 1, I go over the problem of undue inducement, and our current approach to preventing it, in more detail. In Section 2, I argue that, like money, therapeutic benefits of medical research may also unduly induce. In Section 3, I argue that the current approach to preventing undue inducement is absurd in the case of therapeutic inducements. In Section 4, I argue that our current approach is analogously problematic in the case of monetary inducements.
机译:有些人担心提供太多的钱参与医学研究可以引诱人们参与他们更好的判断力。 这些过度吸引力的提议损害判断通常被称为“过度诱导”。 防止过度诱导的目前的方法是限制此类优惠的规模。 希望是较小的优惠不会有足够的吸引力来损害判断力。 即使这是真的,我也认为我们应该拒绝这个解决方案。 在第1节中,我越过过度诱导的问题,以及我们目前的方法,以更详细地防止它。 在第2节中,我认为,像金钱一样,医学研究的治疗益处也可能过度诱导。 在第3节中,我认为目前在治疗诱导的情况下,预防过度诱导的方法是荒谬的。 在第4节中,我认为,在货币诱导的情况下,我们目前的方法是有问题的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号